### Apollo BBS Archive - November 28, 1988

    $tatus Club Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 4806
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: last
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:46:37

    It's a W-E-A-P-O-N, you boot-camp refugee!

      This is my Weapon,
      and this is my gun.
      This one's for killing,
      and this one's for fun!

    Now drop and give me 50 !
                                    -Mike

    Message: 4807
    Author: $ Jeannie Innajug
    Category: Fire'arms
    Subject: Shoot-out
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:02:18

    Hey............Everyone..........

    The Shoot-out sounds great.  Wish I could have been there!  I was a little
    apprehensive when I logged on this morning, wondering how many of you would
    be left after the blazing shoot-out!

    See Y'aa..............

    Jeannie

    Message: 4808
    Author: $ Jeannie Innajug
    Category: Fire'arms
    Subject: Shoot-out
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:03:18

    Hey..........Jonesey...........

    If I had known you could cook, too..................

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

    See Y'aa..............

    Jeannie

    Message: 4809
    Author: $ Ralph Blehm
    Category: Get-Togethers
    Subject: Shoot out
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 11:02:17

    And a good time was had by all.
                       !!!! SHOOT THEM ALL RALPH !!!!

    Message: 4810
    Author: $ Todd Reese
    Category: Question?
    Subject: Shoot out
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 12:52:43

    Did anyone get shot?

    Message: 4811
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Answer!
    Subject: Todd
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:50:56

            What's a few fingers and toes anyway?

    Creative Corner Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 1955
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: last
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:48:07

    that's because they probably kicked you out of boot-camp or rejected
    you before you could learn how to handle a weapon correctly.

            -Mike

    Message: 1956
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Answer!
    Subject: Mike
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:52:57

            No, actually I was drafted by the Dallas Selective Service Board but
    I hired an attorney and didn't go to Viet Namn in 1962.  That kind of war
    sucks.

    Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 55756
    Author: $ Bob Thornburg
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: James Hawley
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 20:43:55

    Re: 90% of child molestors are Christians.  78% of violent crimes are
    committed
    by Christians.

    99% of all bad people eat mashed potatoes too.  So what does that prove?
    Maybe we should outlaw mashed potatoes??

    Message: 55757
    Author: $ Bob Thornburg
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: J.L.
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 20:58:37

    Re: "For me, discrediting Christianity is something that's already been
    thoroughly done."

    Huh?  Maybe in your own eyes it is discredited, but there are a lot of
    Christians on the Apollo that know otherwise.

    Message: 55758
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Rod on God
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:44:31

    "I say that some diehard religionist put this illegal saying on our money."

    I say that some diehard maggot - for -brains wrote the above.
    In GOD WE TRUST is ***NOT*** an "Illegal saying" ; this goes to show how
    pitifully demented your concepts of freedom really are.
    You anti-religious fervor is revealing the total ignorance you wallow in.
    Since you loved Burkarts analogy so much, read this one, it's the same
    just a different topic;
    If 200 million Americans wanted a Tax break and 50 million did NOT, you're
    saying that there SHOULD BE NO TAX BREAK to show respect for the minorities.
    UP YOURS, PINHEAD!
    If you *HATE* God so much, HATE America so much, HATE money so much and
    simply can't stand to live in a country where "In God We Trust" is printed
    in #4 outline print (Real BIG, eh ROddy boy?) then perhaps you should
    respect the wishes of the rest and move elsewhere.
    There you could print your own, smoke and roll your own and be happy and
    own a free house, get free food, pork and poke every blonde haired
    papoose that moved and you could even say that you're KING! Yeah! POPE!
    But if you *WANT* to stay here so much, why not attempt to respect others
    and stop being so selfish, el minority.
                                                    -Mike

    Message: 55759
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Answer!
    Subject: Burkhart
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:04:29

    Your idea that the Majority DOESN't rule reminds me of "Mine Kopf".
    While minority rights should never be overlooked, your argument
    states that individual rights is higher priority than a majority vote.
    I believe you need to re-asses your position on this.

    The same illegitimate ideals can be found in a lot of idiots behind the
    wheel on roadways. They believe that they have a RIGHT to be there, doing
    the speed they want, when they want, no matter who or what effects it
    may have on the majority of drivers. Such problems like burkhart-thinking
    drivers cause accidents, traffic jams and kill millions of people world-wide
    each year. Like Granny in the left lane doing 45 mph.
    At least a country that has been stated as being 10-years behind on
    technology and overall living conditions, like Australia, has a few
    folks who understand that it is no good to be "Dead Right".

            -Mike

    Message: 55760
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Atheists
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:11:20

    ROd propounds almost every known atheist has a perfect mind and is
    sensible, like him, of course! That Atheists are the super race, that
    Atheists will cure the world of its ills, that Atheists will fix everything
    and grow into perfection. Of course the only qualifier to be an Atheist
    in RODS eyes is to deny and despise the existence of s supreme being.
    His very ideals and objects of perfection, evolutionary hype and
    Godless society making a perfect world with a perfect race with no
    imperfections reminds me of something I've read in a Bible.

    I have yet to find more than 1 Atheist who follows the Atheist doctrine
    of not beleiving in a God. The rest are so busy attempting to convince
    themselves and everyone who gets in their way that they start hating the
    very GOD they deny exists.

    These are the PERFECT, elect, straight-thinking super-humans as touted
    by Rod Williams himself.
    Whaddya know, ROd's trying to be an Atheist too.
                                                    -Mike

    Message: 55761
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Cliff/Majority Rule
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:15:19

    Tell that to the blacks that are being repressed by the white minority in
    South Africa. No majority OR minority should RULE. Everyone should work
    together. I know it is terribly idealistic, but a pretty nice ideal if you
    ask me.

    Message: 55762
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Sloan's T(r)ash
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:39:12

    If you had a life of your own, then you wouldn't hang around her attempting
    to insult those whom you think don't have one. No one holds a gun to
    anyone's head and forces them to subscribe to any BBS. It is the person's
    decision, and it is their right to do it if they wish to do so. If you DID
    have any stable lifestyle of your own, you wouldn't have to preoccupy
    yourself with boosting your sagging ego by insulting those (who are probably
    better off, self-wise, than you are) with childishly superficial GARBAGE. If
    you DID have a life of your own, you would be living it, and leaving US
    alone to live OUR lives the way WE want. And you call Skateworld a LIFE? Get
    real. I have seen more childishness, superficiality, and immaturity there
    than I have seen since graduating the fourth grade! But why I am wasting my
    time trying to have a reasonable discussion with you. Go back to your tiny
    little "life." See you in the statistics.

    Message: 55763
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Rod/33rd HAW!
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:40:17

    Spooky shit, Maynerd.

    Message: 55764
    Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
    Category: $tatus users only
    Subject: message 55752
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:56:59

    The message 55752 was edited of the FOUL language.... have a Laugh!

    *=* SYSOP Cliff *=*

    Message: 55765
    Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
    Category: Answer!
    Subject: Daryl...sigh
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 23:25:49

            If the majority could not get their wishes carried out... NOTHING
    would get done...because there would always be someone who would not agree.
    You idealistic thought...is dumb to say the least.
            This is a democratic society.
            Democracy: n.; from 'demos' the people.  Government by the people,
    majority rule.

            Now this country is not good enough for some, they wish to turn it
    into a circus!
            One more thing... We live in the United States of America, not South
    Africa... I am not talking about the Communist nations either.  I am trying
    to keep the U.S.of A. from turning into counties like those others where the
    Minority rule.  Some of you guys seem hell bent on taking what the people
    want and putting it into the hands of some fool Judges that are easily
    swayed by some damn minority.

    *=* SYSOP Cliff *=*

    Message: 55766
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Ok, How Bout This
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 23:36:36

    You, in effect, can claim yourself as a one-man majority in regard to this
    BBS. You control everything that goes on this board, in spite of the fact
    that there is a majority of users on here, as opposed to a minority of
    two sysops. Yet, the minority here decides what gets done, who can say what,
    and so on. You claim that my sensibilities are "dumb." However, if you were
    as loyal to your "majority rule" ideology, you would not be a sysop.

    Message: 55767
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Things...
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 00:30:48

    Ok, after a long talk with Cliff, we are in agreement on this point. The
    Bible, the words within, that is, are what's valuable. The paper itself is
    not. In such a case, I can see with this idea, that I should ease up on my
    comments concerning a certain four words on our currency. That much is
    settled. I thought I would post that I admit to making a mistake. Let's see
    how many other people will willingly admit to making such a mistake.

    Message: 55768
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: More Things...
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 00:39:15

    When someone admits to making a mistake, please try and refrain from
    continuing to throw their folly back into their face again and again. Even
    though it might be intended (in one way or another) to be a joke, it
    probably won't be percieved as such. It's hard to detect humor when it is in
    sacrastic tones and in written form without any indication that it is to be
    intended as such. In fact, if you don't have something nice to say, refrain
    from saying it altoghether. It will keep you from getting into situations
    you would rather not be in, or lose friends you don't want to lose. Not
    saying that I have lost anyone's friendship (perhaps a modicum of respect,
    perhaps...sorry, just the way I feel) but I have started to realize what a
    fatal mistake it can be to post any real honest opinions on a BBS. It opens
    up a nest of unfriendly vipers, and you end up having to defend yourself for
    both things that you actually said, and things that people claim you said.
    As for me, I will keep my Bible clean and neat, so that I can read it
    without too much of the difficulties that might occur if there are
    smudgemarks, burnmarks, or pages missing due to the calling of Mother
    Nature. With that much settled, perhaps we can move past petty bickering,
    and making mountains out of molehills. As a Christian, you should love your
    neighbor. Judging by some of the mudslinging and mud deflecting of late
    amongst many who call themselves Christians (and I hope they all are...I do
    love you all), a bad example has been made by all, and to those who are not
    of the faith, it has either proven to be more fuel to their fire, or perhaps
    something else to deter them from learning the Word of the Lord.

    As Christians, we should work together toward a better understanding, not
    attempt to seperate each other through arguments over things that needn't
    even be argued about. To those that believe...well, we're in the end times
    folks. Now, more than ever, we need to band together, to grow together, not
    tear each other apart. We need to teach each other, to understand that there
    is a time to listen and a time to speak. That we must to unto others as we
    expect them to do unto us. Now there are those of us who don't believe in
    togetherness. That it is war that keeps us together. That there is no place
    among the people of the Earth for love. I'm sorry, I can't go along with
    that. I know this is a debate board, and I know that most debates are one
    view vs. one view (not always, but most of the time). But I am seeing
    Christians attack Christians attack Atheists attack (fill in your religion
    here). Debates are meant to bring understanding. Warring only brings
    seperation and unrest. I will cut this short, as Cliff has expressed to me
    that he finds it long-winded and boring. Perhaps it is. But it is how I
    feel. And if I cannot express my views on this board (and I think I can, or
    else this message would have been deleted already) then I see no reason in
    using it. Telecommunications is a tool. Use it. Don't abuse it. Knowledge
    brings power. Power can corrupt, yes, but with the PROPER knowledge, the
    power it yields can work wonders! If you think war is a necessary evil, then
    you will probably be dismayed to find it absent from the Kingdom of Heaven.
    Goodnight.

               >-> Daryl The Long Winded and Boring <-<

    Message: 55770
    Author: $ Nick Ianuzzi
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: last couple
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 02:47:26

    Quit babbling.

    Message: 55771
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: DAryl
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 06:16:10

    I quite agree with your concepts. It is very disturbing to find Christians
    squabbling among themselves, over such trivialities as denomination,
    tradition and interpretation, when all we need in common is the shed blood
    of our precious Lord and Saviour.
     I sometimes wonder what in heaven some of us are going to find to talk
    about when we all get together on the "other side".
    God bless you Daryl, as you continue your walk with Him.

    Message: 55772
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Last Two
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:59:18

    Rather interesting contrast between those two responses.

    Nick, I'll take that as a joke.

    Paul, thank you and God Bless.

    Message: 55773
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: 55725/Taranto
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:05:05

    I think that printing "In God We Trust" on the currency is more than
    "acknowledging that religion was central to the settling and founding of our
    nation," I think it amounts to promotion of religion.  On the other hand, I
    have no objection to the teaching of the history of religion in America in
    public school, as long as it is balanced and objective.
       It had earlier appeared to me that your position was that while it is
    unconstitutional for the government to promote any particular religion, it
    is not unconstitutional for it to promote religious belief in general.  Now
    it appears that you think both are unconstitutional, but that the motto
    we've been discussing doesn't constitute either.

    Message: 55774
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Sandy
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:07:04

    I'm working on a Ph.D. in philosophy (phi. of mind) with a minor in
    cognitive science.  That minor may end up being another degree.

    Message: 55775
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Mike
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:11:24

    Unfortunately, it's not true that Ph.D.'s don't impress anyone.  (I say
    unfortunately, because I agree that most of them are fairly meaningless--a
    Ph.D. is no guarantee that a person has any idea what he's talking about.)
    I'm working on mine out of my own personal interest in the subject.  By the
    way, I've had real jobs for 7 years and paid far more in taxes than I've
    taken out in loans (which I fully intend to pay off).
       Thanks for your Christian concern.

    Message: 55776
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Carter
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:15:28

    I'm having a bit of trouble getting anything coherent out of your message,
    but I should point out that atheism does not imply hedonism, or humanism, or
    anything else.  That's part of the reason I am opposed to Madalyn Murray
    O'Hair's American Atheists organization.  I don't think atheism constitutes
    a common ground sufficient for forming an organization any more than not
    being a fisherman does.

    Message: 55777
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Thornburg
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:28:20

    Good point regarding the statistics.  It shows that we should compare the
    percentage of Christian child molestors and violent crime committors with
    the percentage of Christians in the population at large.  In the mashed
    potato case, it's clear that the percentage in the general population is
    almost exactly the same, which makes any alleged causal relationship between
    crime and potatoes highly questionable (to say the least).  If, on the other
    hand, we found that a significantly smaller percentage of the general
    population ate mashed potatoes, we might have something.
       So, if significantly less than 90% of the general population is Christian
    (which I believe is the case), then there must be some other explanation to
    the fact (assuming it is a fact) that 90% of child molestors are Christians.
     One possible explanation is that people in prison simply claim to be
    Christian in order to get leniency, an early parole, or whatever.  This
    definitely is something that happens.  On the other hand, there really is
    strong evidence that a large proportion of child molestors are clergymen.
    (For example, Annie Laurie Gaylor's book _Betrayal of Truth_ documents
    several hundred publicized cases over the last few years.)

    Message: 55778
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: 55757/Thornburg
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:38:39

    Unfortunately, the Christians who "know" otherwise tend to be completely
    unfamiliar with any of the opposing evidence--they've never heard of G.A.
    Wells, of Bornkamm, Kaesemann, Dibelius, Bultmann, Richard Friedman, Elaine
    Pagels, David Strauss.  And unfamiliarity with easily available contrary
    evidence undermines any claim to knowledge (which is, at the very least,
    justified true belief).

    Message: 55779
    Author: $ Jim Lippard
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: 55767-69/Daryl
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:47:22

    I'm sorry that you are coming to the conclusion that it is a "fatal mistake"
    to post honest opinions on a BBS.  I for one have found your contributions
    valuable (though I frequently disagree with them) and hope that you would
    continue making serious contributions rather than resort to superficial
    contributions (such as the repetitive and tiresome sarcastic attacks that
    some users insist upon making).

    Message: 55780
    Author: $ Todd Reese
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Burkhart
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 12:51:19

    Imagine for a moment, if you will...  if minority ruled.  Imagine all the
    differences there would be if government/etc were based on minority rule
    instead of majority rule.

    An interesting thought...

    Message: 55781
    Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: OLD TIME TEST
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 13:08:37

    Ahhh, this is fun!  I am logged on Apollo from Wood
    Brothers & Halstead Lumber's TRS-80 Mod 4 with a 300
    Baud accustic modem.... using Omniterm.  Seems only
    a few years ago, this was a hot setup....
    Anyway... this test has passed.

    The old days were slower than I rememberd!

    Give me my 2400 BAUD anyday!

    Omniterm must do something funny with CTRL A, I will
    have to say *=* SYSOP Cliff *=* manualy...Grrrrr

    Message: 55782
    Author: $ Chris Neal
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Slone
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 17:11:22

    We, The people of this BBS refuse to have an intectually stimulating
    arguement with someone who is completely unarmed...
    Now to the basics, before we get a life, you need to get a job, to show you
    the value of a dollar! Geek!

    ----------=============*******>CHRIS<*******=============------114/18.8

    Message: 55783
    Author: $ Apro Poet
    Category: Politics
    Subject: Chomsky
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 17:52:30

      We might note that the dual Latin American reaction to
    Toriello's words has been duplicated more than once.  UN
    correspondent Louis Wiznitzer, commenting on how "United
    States standing in Latin America has reached an all-time low"
    because of US actions against Nicaragua, observes that "one
    sign of Latin American feelings toward the US was the cool
    reception Vice-President George Bush and Secretary of State
    George Shultz received" when they appeared at the
    inauguration of the new Brazilian president.  They "are not
    personally unpopular in Latin America," he notes, "Yet at
    this reception they were booed, while Nicaragua's President
    Daniel Ortega was applauded," a fact generally unreported
    here.  Two months earlier, ABC reported that on a visit to
    Uruguay, Ortega was "greeted by wildly enthusiastic crowds,
    cheering his name as if he was about to be named president of
    Uruguay," a fact again generally ignored in the media.  But
    few Latin Americans will risk offending the hemisphere's Big
    Brother when the chips are down.
      Returning to Guatemala, the relevant point is that whatever
    the facts, Guatemala had to be an agency of the Communist
    conspiracy so as to justify the U.S. overthrow of its
    democratic government, motivated on quite different grounds.
      This characteristic device of US foreign policy is now
    being employed in the familiar manner in Nicaragua, where the

    Reagan Administration is attempting to drive the Sandinista
    regime securely into the hands of the Evil Empire just as it
    is acting to undermine the private sector through embargo, so
    as to create the "totalitarian" state that is required to
    justify US violence, to the distress of business groups and
    the conservative Nicaraguan Church hierarchy that we purport
    to favor.
      Harvard Business School professor James Austin describes
    the embargo as "a flagrant violation of international
    agreements," and also "an affront to the basic values of our
    society" and a "foreign policy blunder" that is
    "counterproductive" because it drives Nicaragua towards
    dependence on the Soviet Union.  The first point is correct;
    the second reflects a serious misunderstanding both of the
    basic values of our society as they are expressed in
    historical practice, and of the goals of the policy.  Austin
    observes that the boycott violates the GATT agreements on
    trade as well as treaties between Nicaragua and the US; it
    expresses the position "that other countries should adhere to
    the agreements, laws and treaties, but the United States need
    not."  True, but quite consistent with our historical
    practice.  He quotes an "outraged and bewildered marketing
    manager ((who)) exclaimed: "This is the most absurd thing
    the United States has done, because it is mostly hurting the
    private sector'," and he observes that it has even been
    criticized by the US-financed rightist press *La Prensa*.
    Austin comments accurately that the effect will be similar to
    the Cuban boycott, which increased Cuban dependency on the
    USSR, concluding that "the president has failed to learn
    from history."  But US planners understand all of this well
    enough, and are following a rational course (in their terms)
    with ample historical precedent, fully expecting the
    consequences that Austin deplores, and recognizing that these
    consequences will be readily exploited to justify the attack
    against Nicaragua in defense of the Fifth Freedom.  There is
    nothing "absurd" about this, though it does "stand with the
    moral repulsiveness of providing aid to the *contras*," as
    Austin states.  He particularly deplores the fact that the
    embargo will undermine the US-made potable water system and
    Nicaraguan hospitals, which rely on US equipment; all
    "inhumane" and "morally reprehensible," but fully in accord
    with our operative values, throughout our history.

    Message: 55786
    Author: $ Bob Thornburg
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Lippard
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 19:46:00

    Basically, what you are implying, is that most child molestors are
    Christians.  I can't buy it.  If your statistics are correct, they must be
    based on false information.  I do notice that most unbelievers cast
    Christians in an unfavorable light.  For example, in the movies, 90% (my
    statistic) of Christians are portrayed as crazy, evil, greedy, etc.  Now I
    will be the first to admit that Christians are not perfect.  I don't know of
    any who profess to be perfect.  But Hollywood sure misses the mark by a long
    shot.  And I think your statistics miss also.
    But I think the real point of your implication is to support your own point
    of view.  And that is, God does not exist, and anyone who thinks he does is
    quite mixed up in the head.  I think you're wrong.

    Message: 55787
    Author: $ James Taranto
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Lippard/55779
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 19:59:58

    What a geek.

    Message: 55788
    Author: $ James Taranto
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Lippard
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:03:23

    The Constitution does not say anything about "promoting" religious belief;
    it prohibits the establishment of religion by the state.  The latter is a
    much narrower concept than the former.  Suppose, for example, that the
    government sets up a drug-rehabilitation program, and employed clergymen
    among counselors.  This might "promote" religious belief, but it would not
    amount to unconstitutional establishment of religion.

    A school voucher system, in which the government would fund the education of
    students who attend parochial schools, would also tend to "promote"
    religion, but it would not constitute establishment.

    Message: 55790
    Author: $ James Taranto
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Westfall
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:05:08

    Well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me!

    Message: 55791
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Mike
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:54:48

            Your messages have that cute ring to them.

    Message: 55792
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Today
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 21:04:26

            What a wonderful day.  Sure beats last Friday.
                            Rod
    P.S.  There are some good messages here today.

    WAY Below Normal Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 520
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Hawley Crock Smith
    Subject: Creative
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:51:30

    When you lose 60 lbs of that stink-encrusted blubber mass that hangs
    like used rubbers around your belly-button, and when you can add
    without aid of calculator or fingers, then perhaps you can move fast
    enough, agile enough, to catch the train of life that has long since
    passed your stupid soap-box.

    Message: 521
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Christian Rod!
    Subject: Boxes
    Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:54:01

    Yep!
    We have Baked beans, lima beans, chili beans, bean-burrito's,
    kidney beans, green beans, mexican jumping beans, jim beam's and
    a wide variety of gasseous emulsifiers ready in cans.
    All you need to furnish is the CHURCH KEY, asshole!

    Message: 522
    Author: $ James Hawley
    Category: Mike Farter
    Subject: Last
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 03:08:46

    Your last couple of posts only reinforce my message.  You can NEVER come up
    with a good solution or answer to a problem.  You can only spout off your
    incessant Aussie slurs.

    Sometimes I think the Romans had a real good idea when they fed Christians
    to the lions.

    Message: 523
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Mike Farter
    Subject: Mike/last
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:39:57

    Now that was a great Christian post to James if I ever saw one! Where did
    you learn to be so insulting? In Bible class?

    Message: 524
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Annie the ASSp
    Subject: James/lions
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:41:29

    Hahahahahahahahahahaha - Mike owes you a 'touche'! -=*) ANN (*=-

    Message: 525
    Author: $ Daryl Westfall
    Category: Christian Rod!
    Subject: Yeah, Mike
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 09:07:11

    You have to admit, that was pretty insensitive and tasteless, even for a
    master insulter such as yourself. However, I for one did not enjoy it. And
    you know how much I like to exchange insults with you!

    Message: 526
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Silly Burkhart
    Subject: last five
    Date: 11/28/88  Time: 21:08:49

            Is something happening right now in your life that we should know
    about?  Are you in need of any help?  I am available.
                                    Rod
            (This message is for Mike Carter, sorry)

Content of this site is © Mark Firestone or whomever wrote it. All rights reserved.