### Apollo BBS Archive - July 16, 1991

    $tatus Club Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 7596
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: fried brains
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:46:51

     Some people will eat anything! Yuck!

    Message: 7597
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Rod/last
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:50:52

     Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not really after
    you.

    Message: 7598
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Rod on following
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:17:32

    No ones following you dear - thats the Devil doing all those bad things in
    your life. But I thought you knew that. *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 7599
    Author: $ Michael James
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: posts
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 10:46:03

    Excellent posts!  (Except the ones from Daryl.)

    Message: 7600
    Author: $ Beauregard Dog
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: 3rd party lament
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 11:35:09

    Cliff, there may be no *conspiracy* directed against the *Libertarian*
    party, but it is true that in many states the Dems and Reps have made it
    very difficult for *any* third party to attract votes and money for
    campaigns, to be on ballots with party name, etc.  These have been
    documented on Apollo.

    Message: 7601
    Author: $ Apollo SysOp
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: 3rd party lament
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:06:06

          re: These have been documented on Apollo...  ????

            Sorry, that does not prove it is true.  I have never found such
    proof. I just believe the libertarian party does not offer what the majority
    of the people want.  The leaders of the libertarian party then point fingers
    at the Dems and Reps for their own shortcomings rather then accept reality.

            The communist, socialist and libertarian parties are just not going
    to make it in this country.  They all scream of plots against them claiming
    the American people really want them...    All Hogwash!

    *=* the 'Mighty' Apollo SysOp *=*  <-clif-

    Message: 7602
    Author: $ Beauregard Dog
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Belief
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:13:56

    Believe what you will.

    Message: 7603
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Beau/Libertarians
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:30:58

    You'll be pleased to know that the Final Jeopardy Round in the Seniors
    Tournament on Monday required the contestants to know that Ron Paul was the
    Libertarian presidential candidate in 1988. All three contestants asked the
    right question.

    Message: 7604
    Author: $ Dean Hathaway
    Category: Politics
    Subject: Cliff
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 16:42:02

      I might not concur that there is a specific plot against libertarians, but
    I think that you would agree with me in stating that the two parties of
    government do not care so much for translating the will of the people into
    deed as they do for maintaining themselves in office. On offshoot of this is
    that they make it difficult for any alternative viewpoint to reach the point
    where it can become a serious threat to established politicians. Requiring a
    large number of petitions to get a minority party on the ballot effectively
    assures that no such party will be able to compete with those already on it.
      See You Later,
        Dean H.

    Message: 7605
    Author: $ Dean Hathaway
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Daryl/Evolution
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 16:48:20

      I agree that what I have seen of evolutionary theory seems very shakey. I
    haven't seen anything in this which supports creationism as anything but a
    superstitious attempt at filling the gaps in man's knowledge with mythology
    however.
      See You Later,
        Dean H.

    Message: 7606
    Author: $ Gordon Little
    Category: Believe it or not!
    Subject: Vote
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 17:34:58

    The current [V]ote on Apollo is defective.

    It first lists four options, [A], [B], [C], and [D].  Then it goes on to
    ask: How do you vote [A-C] or [CR] to abort.

    Is this a deliberate reflection of the anti-Libertarian plot that we all
    know exists (except Cliff)?  "You have the following choice of parties to
    vote for: Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, etc., etc...  Now, how do you
    vote -- Republocrat or Demolition?"

    Message: 7607
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Politics
    Subject: Libertarian Vote
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 20:57:32

    (A) YES, BY GOD, THERE'S A PLOT AGAINST THE LIBERTARIAN PLATFORM
        AND WE'RE GONNA CONSPIRE AGAINST THE CONSPIRATORS!!!

    (B) YES, BY PLASMA, THERE'S A PLOT AGAINST THE LIBERTARIAN PLATFORM
        AND WE'RE GONNA CONSPIRE AGAINST THE CONSPIRATORS!!!

    (C) HEY, I'VE NEVER HEARD OF "LIBERTARIAN"

    (D) YES, THERE IS AND WE WILL CRUSH THEM.

    Message: 7608
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Entertainment
    Subject: Refried Brains
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 21:01:01

    White Brains on Toast.

    Hey, there's a poster I have that reminds me of all this;

    Top picture: An Egg in a frying pan; caption: This is your brain.
    Second pic : An Egg in a frying pan, frying : This is your brain on drugs
    Third pic  : An Egg in a frying pan, frying along with a strip of bacon.
    "This is your brain with a side-order of bacon."

    Ha. Yer all fried.

    Message: 7609
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: last
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:13:22

    I stay away from bacon and eggs.  How about fried soy beans with a side
    order of kelp?

    Message: 7610
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit-Chat
    Subject: Libertarian
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:17:32

    One of the prime stances of this party is to eliminate the I.R.S., is this
    not so?

    Does anyone believe that the Libertarian party has IRS backing?  There is a
    plot, as mentioned by Noam Chomsky, to keep all political parties away from
    the people.  The one existing party, Demo-Republican serves big business and
    those in power will not allow, through its Press, equal time.

    X-Rated Cosmos Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 4931
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Quickie
    Subject: Cliff on Roger
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:19:05

    Where is dear Roger? Have you let him rot in the Zone? *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 4932
    Author: $ Michael James
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: Posts
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 10:47:16

    Excellent posts!  Excellent!

    Message: 4933
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: This Zone
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:32:07

    Hey ! I LIKE this fucking Zone.

    Message: 4934
    Author: $ Michael James
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: This Zone
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 14:42:36

    Yeah!  It's so goddamn EXCELLENT!

    Message: 4935
    Author: $ Melissa Dee
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: Last
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 16:15:31

    It's AWESOME, dude....

    Message: 4936
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: Last few
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 21:02:33

    Is it alive or is it memorex?

    Message: 4937
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Cosmos-Chatter
    Subject: this sig.
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:19:08

    This SIG causes my pussy to itch.

    Public Bulletin Board command:$C

    Message: 76701
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: B. Dog/76676
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:31:18

     Sounds downright slothful to me!

    Message: 76702
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: 76678
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:33:32

    Green Lantern? I wouldn't be surprised if Roger is already with us, under
    yet another name. The dripping sarcasm is altogether too symptomatic.

    Message: 76703
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Apro/Metrocenter
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:40:44

     I'm not so sure that the streets in and around Metrocenter are "public",
    Apro. It wouldn't surprise me at all to find that the entire area is, in
    fact, private property. If it is, then I guess they are in their rights to
    do whatever they want.

    Message: 76704
    Author: $ Paul Savage
    Category: Question?
    Subject: R. Williams
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 05:45:52

     Concerning the last two posts by our resident hate monger, isn't that just
    about what got Mr. Mann stuck in the Zone a couple of days ago? Or should I
    say, the Green Dragon, or whatever.

    Message: 76705
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Paul/76702
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 07:29:55

    Why are YOU so crabby ?

    Message: 76706
    Author: $ Bill Burkett
    Category: Religion
    Subject: Daryl/Equal? Where?
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 07:39:52

    > Paul believed that men and women, though equal, were not
    > created to be identical to each other.

    How do the verses Ann posted demonstrate Paul's supposed belief in equality?

    Message: 76707
    Author: $ Bill Burkett
    Category: Politics
    Subject: Cruisin' Metro
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 07:41:42

    > Does this mean that if I lived next to I-17 and the cruising
    > traffic (they do have cruise control you know) was a nuisance,
     > I could drop a log across three lanes so long as I paid for it?
    > HAHAHAHAHA  "Nation of laws, not men" my hiney!

            Actually, I believe the City Council did pass a law that authorized
    control of cruising.
            It seems to me to be similar to the laws that prohibit the users of
    main thoroughfares from zipping through residential neighborhoods when the
    pace of rush hour traffic doesn't suit them.
            That strikes me as very similar to the MetroCenter justification,
    and I have a hard time arguing with it even though I think it's stupid to
    try and stop the cruising.
            Funny how what was okay for US when we were kids isn't okay for OUR
    kids.

    Message: 76708
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: War!
    Subject: The vote
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:39:57

    Wait a cotton picking minute here - I wanted to vote for 'D' - Annie is too
    sweet and nice and lovable - but it wouldn't let me. Unfair! Unfair! I'm
    bringing in the Union!!! -=* SOUR GRAPES *=-

    Message: 76709
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Cliff on Zone
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:41:31

    You are right - I do not want people to see my embarrassing groveling posts.
    Hmmm - I wonder what Roger is saying? Did he leave Apollo over his trip?
                                     *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76710
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Question?
    Subject: Cliff on booze
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:44:18

    Re: your ... "<-clif- No Booze for me!"

    You mean when you come over to my house again you won't drink? Even if all
    of us are?? You don't do drugs, smoke cigarettes and now you are giving up
    dah booze? What's next - Sandy? Heh Heh Heh . *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76711
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Green Lantern
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:45:45

    How old are you? I'll bet not yet 18 er? Younger? *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76712
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Green again
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:46:57

    Re: your ... "You people (Apollo) sure are crabby" ... gave me a real belly
    laugh! Heck Green, we ain't even in a bad mood right now! *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76713
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Question?
    Subject: Daryl
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:50:03

    Uhhhh . what "personal vices" am I retaining and not following Jesus?
    I can't see where I do one thing that would displease Him regarding vices.
                                     *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76714
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Daryl on Paul
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 08:59:20

    I disagree with you all the way re: Paul. Those Bible verses I sent here
    left no doubt that he distinguished that men were better - especially that
    Eve sinned first and led poor Adam astray! Of course men and women are
    different and have different roles - but only on a VERY basic level and that
    mainly is child birth.

    BTW - while we are on the subject - what do you feel about the woman's
    movement? Do you feel the women should, if they wish, go to work, get as
    much pay, demand equality in all things?

    Pardon me, but I assume you also believe in the head of the house hold - it
    seems to automatically come with the territory - but what if your wife works
    also - lets say she even brings home the same amount of money - would you
    then still be the head of the household? Just curious. *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    I guess what I am trying to say about Paul .... he absolutely gives one set
    of rules for men and another set for women and I just don't think God had
    that in mind. Do you?
    Read those verses I sent closely. You might change your mind about them.

    Message: 76715
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Rod on Daryl
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:00:52

    He can't be St. Daryl - he's not Catholic. *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76716
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Bill #76706
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:02:48

    Thank you Bill for putting it so very simply. *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76717
    Author: $ Ann Oudin
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Bill on cruising
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:12:52

    I have always been for it - cruising. What would we reather our kids be
    doing - robbing a store? One time when it was OK at Metrocenter, we cruised
    with them briefly. There was hundreds, maybe thousands of kids in that area
    - in cars, in vacant lots, in parking lots etc. and I was amazed at how much
    fun they were having with very little trouble considering the size of the
    crowd. I thought Metro was a real stinker when they stopped it - made a
    police action out of it!
    One night hubby and I came out of Metro quite late and couldn't find a way
    out because of all the barracades. We finally found one with two Metro
    center police with guns in their belts stopped us (we were in the Vette) and
    started acturally yelling at us - ask what we were doing there and before we
    could answer, told us to get out of the car. My husband, not one to keep his
    temper in such incidents, got red in the face, in a  lethal voice told that
    pseudo policeman where to go and also mention that we'd sue the hell out of
    them/ Metro if they didn't stop harrassing us. The guy backed off but he
    still acted like he had lots of authority. In reality, he had very little.
    This happened when they first stopped the cruising in Metro. I don't think
    the had their s#*t together yet. Ha. *>>> ANN O. <<<*

    Message: 76718
    Author: Jim Potts
    Category: Hard/Software
    Subject: Want to Buy..
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 09:45:27

    I am looking for a used CGA monitor if anyone out there has one for sale
    Please leave me mail on this BBS or call me at (602) 861-1807 or (602)
    944-3389. My name is Jim Potts .

    Message: 76719
    Author: $ Michael James
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Green Lantern
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 10:41:45

    Welcome to Apollo, I guess.

    Message: 76721
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Ann/Green
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:25:16

    Well, let's put it this way. I am not a great-grandmother.

    Message: 76722
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Ann/Thanks
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:27:20

    I like you, Annie.

    Message: 76723
    Author: $ Green Lantern
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Michael/Welcome
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 12:28:38

    All right. Thanks. I guess.

    Message: 76724
    Author: $ Apro Poet
    Category: Politics
    Subject: Prohiboholics Anon.
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 18:03:13

      Responsibility for the Philippines in 1898 added an
    international dimension to the growing domestic alarm about
    drug abuse.  It also revealed that Congress, if given the
    opportunity, would prohibit non-medicinal uses of opium
    among its new dependents.  Civil Governor William Howard
    Taft proposed reinstituting an opium monopoly--through which
    the previous Spanish colonial government had obtained
    revenue from sales to opium merchants--and using those
    profits to help pay for a massive public education campaign.
    President Theodore Roosevelt vetoed this plan, and in 1905
    Congress mandated an absolute prohibition of opium for any
    purpose other than medicinal use.
      To deal efficiently with the antidrug policy established
    for the Philippines, a committee from the Islands visited
    various territories in the area to see how others dealt with
    the opium problem.  The benefit of controlling narcotics
    internationally became apparent.
      In early 1906 China had instituted a campaign against
    opium, especially smoking opium, in an attempt to modernize
    and to make the Empire better able to cope with continued
    Western encroachments on its sovereignty.  At about the same
    time, Chinese anger at maltreatment of their nationals in
    the U.S. seethed into a voluntary boycott of American goods.
    Partly to appease the Chinese by aiding their antiopium
    efforts and partly to deal with uncontrollable smuggling
    within the Philippine Archipelago, the U.S. convened a
    meeting of regional powers.  In this way, the U.S. launched
    a worldwide campaign for worldwide narcotics traffic control
    that would extend through the years in an unbroken
    diplomatic sequence from the League of Nations to the
    present efforts of the United Nations.
      the International Opium Commission, a gathering of 13
    nations, met in Shanghai in February 1909.  The Protestant
    Episcopal bishop of the Philippines, Charles Henry Brent,
    who had been instrumental in organizing the meeting, was
    chosen to preside.  Resolutions noting problems with opium
    and opiates were adopted, but they did not constitute a
    treaty, and no decisions bound the nations attending the
    commission.  In diplomatic parlance, what was needed now was
    a conference not a commission.  The U.S. began to pursue
    this goal with determination.
      The antinarcotics campaign in America had several
    motivations.  Appeasement of China was certainly one factor
    for officials at the State Department.  The department's
    opium commissioner, Hamilton Wright, thought the whole
    matter could be "used as oil to smooth the troubled water of
    our aggressive commercial policy there."  Another reason was
    the belief, strongly held by the federal government today,
    that controlling crops and traffic in producing countries
    could most efficiently stop U.S. nonmedical consumption of
    drugs.
      To restrict opium and coca production required worldwide
    agreement and, thus, an international conference.  After
    intense diplomatic activity, one was convened in the Hague
    in December 1911.  Brent again presided, and on January 23,
    1912, the 12 nations represented signed a convention.
    Provision was made for the other countries to comply before
    the treaty was brought into force.  After all, no producing
    or manufacturing nation wanted to leave the market open to
    nonratifying nations.
      The convention required each country to enact domestic
    legislation controlling narcotics trade.  The goal was a
    world in which narcotics were restricted to medicinal use.
    Both the producing and consuming nations would have control
    over their boundaries.
      After his return from Shanghai, Wright labored to craft a
    comprehensive federal antinarcotics law.  In his path loomed
    the problem of states' rights.  The health professions were
    considered a major cause of patient addiction.  Yet how
    could federal law interfere with the prescribing practices
    of physicians or require that pharmacists keep records?
    Wright settled on the federal government's power to tax; the
    result, after prolonged bargaining with pharmaceutical,
    import, export and medical interests, was the Harrison Act
    of December 1914.
      Representative Francis Burton Harrison's association with
    the act was an accidental one, the consequence of his
    introduction of the administration's bill.  If the chief
    proponent and negotiator were to be given eponymic credit,
    it should have been called the Wright Act.  It could even
    have been called the second Mann Act, after Representative
    James Mann, who saw the bill through to passage in the
    House of Representatives, for by that time Harrison had
    become governor-general of the Philippines.
      The act required a strict accounting of opium and coca and
    their derivatives from entry into the U.S. to dispensing to
    a patient.  To accomplish this control, a small tax had to
    be paid at each transfer, and permits had to be obtained by
    applying to the Treasury Department.  Only the patient paid
    no tax, needed no permit and, in fact, was not allowed to
    obtain one.
      Initially Wright and the Department of Justice argued that
    the Harrison Act forbade indefinite maintenance of addiction
    unless there was a specific medical reason such as cancer or
    tuberculosis.  This interpretation was rejected in 1916 by
    the Supreme Court--even though the Justice Department argued
    that the Harrison Act was the domestic implementation of the
    Hague Opium Convention and therefore took precedence over
    states' rights.  Maintenance was to be allowed.
    (continued)

    Message: 76729
    Author: $ Apollo SysOp
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Daryl & the bird
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 19:35:14

            Thanks...  It was a great you coming by today and giving me the
    bird.  So far, so good.  'No-Name' is doing fine ........

            It will take about 3 days for it to adjust, till then we will just
    leave it alone as much as possible.

            Thanks for the bag of food....   Yum-yum

    *=* the 'Mighty' Apollo SysOp *=*  <-clif-

    Message: 76730
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: B.Dog
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 21:06:45

    Don't get your dander up if I choose not to reply to anything you post.
    Firstly, I answer to no one here.
    Secondly I choose what I'm going to spend time replying too.
    And Thridly, your post was more opinion, unbased and unfounded as
    most you've ever written. I don't see how you expect me to
    react to such a post, unless you want me to disaggree.
    Frankly I don't care what you believe. It's obvious you don't care
    what I or anyone else does that conflicts with your own, so the
    whole thing is moot.
    Like you said elsewhere, "Believe what you wanna believe."

    Just don't whine too much on the final day, it'll be in front of
    everybody...and I do mean *everybody*.

    ;-)

    Message: 76731
    Author: $ Mike Carter
    Category: In search of
    Subject: Free Press
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 21:19:36

    After quite a number of phone calls and a couple letters, I'm convinced
    that we truly now donot have a free press.
    The newspapers seem to avoid having anything to do with freelancers.
    "On the rare, exceptional case, we will buy freelance material.." a direct
    quote from R&G's buisiness editor. This was in reference to a call I had
    placed asking how interested they'd be on a close up of the Airport.
    "We already have an Aviation reporter.."
    Q:"How about stuff around the valley, human interest stories etc?"
    A:"Very rarely do we accept that, we just don't have space.."

    This isn't the only place. In the past I have called and or written
    letters asking about submission details. I, so far, have received the
    same general sounding answers. That (1) Unless you're writing a letter
    "To the Editor" or (2) Your material is so un-political, un-controversial
    and tastless i.e.; Knitting secrets from Grandma and 41 things to do
    on the way to Disneyland, they don't want anything to do with you.
    Long gone are the days when I could write a piece and be fairly certain
    it would get printed. Anymore, I think I know why.
    People or companies that get bad press don't write back and refute
    or explain or deny, they sue. It has become so ridiculous now that
    a large portion of the R&G's salary outgo is for Lawyers on their payroll.
    Everyone and everything has become so sensitive to commentary or
    any form of criticism, that nobody wants to publish such, for fear of
    more lawsuits.

    The same thing is happening with employers and health insurance.
    There's a bunch of employers who wont hire you if you smoke, have
    a high cholesterol count, a history of cancer in the family or any
    physical disorder that might cost their insurance big bucks.
    You think I'm joking? People have been fired !
    No, there's no freedoms anymore. No real "Freedom of the Press."
    The R&G wont run smear ads against their candidates, only on the
    opposition. Selective advertising policy has long been in effect at
    most all newspapers across the country.
    So if John Q Public has something to say, it had better be 100 words or
    less...then *if* it gets printed, after the editor hacks and slashes it
    it *might* contain the original meaning..and then, back page time.

    I think, although I don't aggree with the man, but I think I know
    now why Evan Mecham wants to run his own newspaper.
    If you have something you wish to say, or just plain want to write
    and be interactive, go live elsewhere...like perhaps another galaxy.
    Once upon a time there was a local newspaper that had a small section
    called "City Tabloid", where anyone who had a pen and paper could
    get printed so long as it fell under the generally acceptable rules
    of civility, and no one was singled out by name.
    It was very popular back then. I think some enterprising lawyer
    got his first set of wheels suing them over something, and bought a house
    to work out of. BBS's are the last of a dying freedom.

    Message: 76733
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Cliff/bird
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:24:00

    I have a bird for you.

    Message: 76734
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Mike/free press
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:26:15

    You're just paranoid.  (but I agree)

    Message: 76735
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Green Lantern
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:26:56

    If you are a beautiful female then come on over.  If not then stay the hell
    away.

    Message: 76736
    Author: $ Rod Williams
    Category: Chit Chat
    Subject: Paul/my 2 posts
    Date: 07/16/91  Time: 22:30:36

    Whatsthematter, I post bible verses and you complain.  When I don't quote
    bible verses, you complain.  Aren't you ever happy?

    Or are you the one who stands out in public and talks to a god?

    Or perhaps you are not aware of that New Testament Bible verse and think I
    just made it up.

    Or does my revelation mean that you can't watch Jan and Paul Crotch any
    longer?

                                    Rod

Content of this site is © Mark Firestone or whomever wrote it. All rights reserved.