Path: bloom-beacon.mit.edu!grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!olivea!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!utah-morgan!news.cs.utah.edu!lal.cs.utah.edu!thomson
From: thomson@lal.cs.utah.edu (Rich Thomson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.pex,comp.answers,news.answers
Subject: (28mar94) Welcome to comp.windows.x.pex! (FAQ)
Followup-To: comp.windows.x.pex
Date: 1 May 1994 10:20:19 GMT
Organization: University of Utah Computer Science Department
Lines: 891
Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2pvvp3$9o1@magus.cs.utah.edu>
Reply-To: thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: lal.cs.utah.edu
Summary: Frequently asked questions about PEX
Keywords: PEX, FAQ
Frequency: weekly
X-Rcs-Header: $Header: /n/jaguar/u/thomson/.Mail/RCS/pex-faq,v 1.1 1994/03/17 22:45:19 thomson Exp $
Xref: bloom-beacon.mit.edu comp.windows.x.pex:1008 comp.answers:5144 news.answers:18914

Archive-name: pex-faq
Last-Modified: 28 March 1994

This article discusses frequently asked questions (FAQs) about PEX,
the PHIGS Extensions to the X Window System.  Each question is grouped
as an article in a digest.  Some news readers (i.e rn) have commands
for skipping to the next article in a digest.  In rn, ^G (control-G)
skips to the next article in a digest.  The information in this
article is culled from several sources: the FAQ in comp.windows.x,
and articles in the newsgroups comp.windows.x and comp.graphics.
Where possible, the author, date and article id of the original
newsgroup article is included.  When I have edited/modified the
original article, I have enclosed my modifications in square brackets
[] with my initials (RT) at the end.

Contents:
  1)  What's new?
  2)  What is PEX?
  3)  How can I tell if my X server supports PEX?
  4)  Why don't the R5 PEX demos work on my mono screen?
  5)  Where can I get an X-based PEX package?
  6)  What about immediate mode for PEX?
  7)  Why don't the R5 PEX contributed demos compile?
  8)  Why doesn't double-buffering work via phigs_ws_type_create?
  9)  What does "Kernel not configured with shared-memory IPC" mean?
 10)  Obtaining Graphics Standards (GKS, PHIGS, etc.)
 11)  PHIGS/PEX Books
 12)  Articles on PEX
 13)  PEX Application Programmer Interfaces (APIs)
 14)  PHIGS Toolkit -- a portable toolkit for PHIGS programmers
 15)  Why doesn't HLHSR mode (Z buffering) work with the PEX-SI?

Acronyms:

ANSI		American National Standards Institute
API		Application Programmer Interface
CGM		Computer Graphics Metafile
GKS		Graphics Kernel System
HLHSR		Hidden line and hidden surface removal
ISO		International Organization for Standardization
PEX		PHIGS/PHIGS-PLUS Extensions to X
PHIGS		Progammer's Hierarchical Interactive Graphics System
PHIGS-PLUS	PHIGS Plus Lumiere Und Surfaces
R5		X Window System, Version 11 Release 5
SI		Sample Implementation

------
Subject:  1)  What's new?
From: Rich Thomson <thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 28 14:14:49 MST 1994

Modifications since the 13 September 1993 version:
o   Added section on HLHSR with the PEX-SI

Modifications since the 3 March 1993 version:
o   Revamped section on PHIGS books

Added since the 7 December version:
o   Clarification that although PEX stands for "PHIGS Extensions to
    X", this acronym's expansion has only historical significance in light
    of PEX 6.0
o   Changing of API section to have updated information on PEXtk and PEXlib
o   Changing of book section to have information on O'Reilly
    PHIGS/PEXlib books
o   Added new section on the PHIGS Toolkit from the UK
o   This section describing changes from the last version

------
Subject:  2)  What is PEX?
From: hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Jay Hersh)
Date: Mon Dec  7 14:10:47 MST 1992
Message-Id: <9201201706.AA13024@xenon.lcs.mit.edu>

[PEX originally stood for PHIGS Extensions to X.  However, this name
is nothing more than history at this point, since the next version of
the PEX protocol, version 6.0, is not really designed specifically for
PHIGS at all.  Rather, it is designed to support 3D application
programs in general. --RT]  It is a an Extension to the Core X
Protocol to provide 3D graphics support within the X Windows
environment.  Included in the X11R5 distribution is code for the
Sample Implementation of the extensions to the X Windows server which
implements the functionality defined by the PEX Protocol Extensions.

In order to access the PEX funtional extensions to the X Server
one must use an application that generates PEX Protocol.  The
application can either generate the Protocol bytestream itself, or
use something called an Application Protocol Interface or API for
short.  One such API which is provided with the X11R5 distribution
is the PHIGS 3D graphics standard.  This is a port of the PHIGS C
language binding onto an internal layer which generates the PEX
Protocol allowing this particular PHIGS implementation to work
within the X windows environment.

Other alternate APIs are available via anonymous ftp from
export.lcs.mit.edu.

Patches for a variety of problems in R5 are now available via
anonymous ftp on export.lcs.mit.edu, and the xstuff mail archive
server on expo.lcs.mit.edu.

Fixes are available via anonymous ftp to export.lcs.mit.edu
(18.24.0.12), in the directory /pub/R5/fixes/.  The files for the new
fixes are "fix-18", "fix-19", and "PEXlib.tar.Z".  PEXlib.tar.Z is
part of fix #19.  Instructions for applying the fixes are included in
the files.  Fixes usually propagate to other distribution sites as
well, so it may pay to check at a nearer site first.

- Jay Hersh
  MIT X Consortium

------
Subject:  3)  How can I tell if my X server supports PEX?
From: hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Jay Hersh)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 92 12:06:01 -0500
Message-Id: <9201201706.AA13024@xenon.lcs.mit.edu>

The xdpyinfo command displays all the extensions supported by a server.
If one of the extensions listed is X3D-PEX then your server supports PEX.

- Jay Hersh
  MIT X Consortium

------
Subject:  4)  Why don't the R5 PEX demos work on my mono screen?
From: xug@mta.com (X User's Group)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 91 20:51:04 GMT
Message-Id: <1991Dec15.205122.5581@mta.com>
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x

The R5 sample server implementation only works on color screens, sorry.

------
Subject:  5)  Where can I get an X-based PEX package?
From: xug@mta.com (X User's Group)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 91 20:53:23 GMT
Message-Id: <1991Dec15.205323.5657@mta.com>
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x

	The official release of PEX is with X11R5.

	There is now available from the University of Illinois an 
implementation of the PEX 4.0 specification called UIPEX. It contains a "near-
complete" implementation of PHIGS and PHIGS PLUS. The file 
pub/uipex/uipex.tar.Z is on a.cs.uiuc.edu (128.174.252.1); the porting platform
was an RT running 4.3.  Questions and comments can to go uipex@cs.uiuc.edu. 

	In addition, the PEXt toolkit by Rich Thomson
(thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu) is available on export as PEXt.tar.Z; it
includes a PEX widget making it easier to include PEX in Xt-based programs.


------
Subject:  6) What about immediate mode for PEX?
From: jch@Stardent.COM (Jan "Yon" Hardenbergh)
Date: 7 May 91 15:39:02 GMT
Message-Id: <1991May7.153902.6083@Stardent.COM>
References: <JIM.91May6113744@baroque.Stanford.EDU>
Newsgroups: comp.graphics

PEX has immediate mode intrinsically.  No need to add it.  What is
needed is the API.  There are currently three proposed interfaces to PEX
Immediate mode: PEXIM, PEXlib and PEXtk.  PEXIM is actually a PHIGS
subset with immediate mode extensions.  PEXlib is to the PEX protocol
what Xlib it to the X protocol.  PEXtk is trying to capture the best of
the proprietary graphics interfaces.

Of course, PEXIM has the advantage that graphics hackers familiar with
PHIGS can pick it right up, or that can read one of the (great :-) PHIGS
books coming out.

The ANSI PHIGS committee started to add immediate mode to PHIGS.  So,
eventually, the API for PEX immediate mode will probably fall back to
PHIGS, but that is just opinion.

From: jim@baroque.Stanford.EDU (James Helman)
> But does this actually address the problem?  The main reason that
> PHIGS is well-suited for networked graphics is that once your large
> mass of geometry is downloaded, you can rapidly change attributes and
> transformations without blasting the whole object down the slow wire.
> But in immediate mode, one typically sends everything down the wire
> each draw cycle.  With graphics speeds hitting 1 million polys per
> second, you certainly can't blast enough data down an ethernet to feed
> the graphics hardware.

You have to look at what is happening to the majority of the data.  If
the geometry is stable but the attribute change, then you can store the
geometry in the server and use immediate mode to send the attributes.
This is referred to as "mixed mode" or mixing stored structures with
immediate mode.  This is a very powerful model of graphics.

> Hence unless network bandwidth outpaces graphics performance, an
> immediate mode PEX API won't be particularly useful over a network.
> One could replace the PEX layer with local graphics access to get
> performance, thus making the immediate mode PEX API a standard for
> non-PEX graphics, but this is a rather convoluted path to such an end.

It's never safe to assume that the relative speeds of components of the
system will stay the same.  You are comparing the high end of rendering
with the low end of networking.  Compare the current high end of
networking, like FDDI at 12 MBytes per second and it works out just
fine.  1 M polygons/sec takes 12 MB / second.  Of course both of those
numbers are PEAK numbers.  When you start to look at what applications
really do, the peak numbers become irrelevant.

> Maybe GL and XGL's days aren't so numbered.  Or am I missing
> something?  Perhaps, local shared memory PEX request queues?  The
> article didn't even mention bandwidth as a concern.

Yes, of course good implementations of PEX will have shared memory.

But let's talk about the bread and butter cases.  The majority of the
market has not hit the 30 K triangles per second mark.  Ethernet can
keep up with that quite easily, and shared memory does more than keep
up.

But, there is overhead in a network transparent protocol.  To get rid of
it would require the application to write thier data directly into the
shared memory, then there are no copies, still something to work for.
People used to say X would never work due to the overhead, or for that
matter that fancy UI's do not work due to the overhead.  Depends on what
you want and where your priorities are.

My guess is that the combination of compute servers and PEX terminals
and workstations will help PEX become the graphics of choice.  If you
are not recomputing your 1 million triangles they can be in the display
list.  If you are recomputing them, how long does that take? on what
machine?

Disclaimer: I've had something to do with PEX and PEXIM and I always
speak on my own behalf, unless specifically stated otherwise.

-Jan "YON" Hardenbergh       jch@stardent.com         (508)-371-9810x261
Stardent Computer, 6 N.E. Tech Center, 521 Virginia Rd,Concord, MA 01742

------
Subject:  7)  Why don't the R5 PEX contributed demos compile?
From: hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 92 15:39:27 -0400
Message-Id: <9204301939.AA06066@exhume.lcs.mit.edu>

>   [Initially at the time of R5's release...] it was a bit of
>   work to upgrade PEX to the new ISO IS PHIGS C Binding.  The examples
>   had been put into contrib a while back and there was no time nor
>   manpower to worry about updating those when other things had to be
>   fixed and upgraded (like the man pages).

The demos have been upgraded.  The new versions for the ISO PHIGS C
binding are available from export.lcs.mit.edu  in the file
PEX.examples.tar.Z in the directory contrib/R5fixes.

- Jay Hersh

-----
Subject:  8)  Why doesn't double-buffering work via phigs_ws_type_create?
From: thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu (Rich Thomson)
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 91 20:38:52 GMT
Message-ID: <1991Nov23.203852.3673@dsd.es.com>
References: <1991Nov22.220338.3560@shell.shell.com>
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,comp.windows.x

In article <1991Nov22.220338.3560@shell.shell.com>
	senften@taurus (Scott D. Senften) writes:
>
>I need your help...I just got X11R5 up and running on my Sparc and I'm wanting
>to do some PHIGS+ work.  I've got a rough prototype up and running but I can't
>seem to get the double buffering working.  I tried:
>
> wks = phigs_ws_type_create(phigs_ws_type_x_tool,
>                            PHIGS_X_BUF_MODE, PHIGS_BUF_DOUBLE,
>                            0);
>
>but that alone doesn't seem to do it.  Am I missing something?

What you're missing is that the PEX-SI provides no support for double
buffering.

A serious hole in the PEX-SI is its non-support for double buffering.
Even worse, the PEX-SI api assumes that the client desires an
XClearArea on the window before each frame is drawn.  What really
should have been done was to provide an end-of-render procedure hook,
with the default hook installed to do a clear area.

Individual vendors (because of market pressure) have provided their
own solutions to the double buffering problem (we do double buffering
an all PHIGS workstations; if you do immediate-mode you get single
buffering along with the PEX-SI's XClearArea call).

I believe the PEX interoperability group is currently working on a vendor
neutral solution that we can all agree on.

						-- Rich

-----
Subject:  9)  What does "Kernel not configured with shared-memory IPC" mean?
From: michaelh@homebrew.WV.TEK.COM (Mike Herbert)
Date: 25 Nov 91 18:54:35 GMT
Message-ID: <12065@orca.wv.tek.com>
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x

Francis J. Hitchens writes:
> I have just built X11R5 on my VAXstatsion 3100, under ULTRIX 4.1, and
> tried to run the PEX
> tests.
>
> They all failed...
>
> PHIGS error -57 in OPEN PHIGS: Kernel not configured with shared-memory IPC
> facility needed for PEX SI communication

I ran into this problem last week.  Here's what I've determined so far.

Your PEX library has been built so that it is trying to use the shared-memory
IPC facility to communicate with the phigsmon program.  If your client
does not need phigsmon, then turn it off:

setenv PEX_SI_API_NO_PM 1

(Typically you should only need phigsmon for doing PHIGS input or client-
side structure storage.)

Another alternative is to rebuild the PEX library so that it uses sockets
to communicate with phigsmon.  You can do this by defining 
"PEX_API_SOCKET_IPC".  (I haven't tried this, but the code indicates
that it should work.) 

The other alternative, of course, it to configure your kernel to use IPC.
(I'm a novice as far as Ultrix is concerned, so I really don't understand
what's involved in doing that.)

Mike Herbert
Tektronix, Inc.
Network Displays Division
P.O. Box 1000, M/S 60-850
Wilsonville, OR 97070
(503) 685-2145

michaelh@orca.WV.TEK.COM

-----
Subject:  10)  Obtaining Graphics Standards (GKS, PHIGS, etc.)
From: jch@Stardent.COM (Jan "Yon" Hardenbergh)
Date: 12 Feb 91 19:27:53 GMT
Message-ID: <1991Feb12.192753.3647@Stardent.COM>
Newsgroups: comp.graphics

GKS - Graphical Kernal System - geometric graphics system
CGM - Computer Graphics Metafile - archive of graphics commands - very
      useful for plotting.
PHIGS - the best graphics standard!  3D geometric graphics with lighting
      and shading and neat primitives to draw fancy pictures.
If you are looking for a broad overview of graphics standards you might
try this:

>   Guidelines for determining when to use GKS and when to use PHIGS
>   Bettels, J.; Bono, P.R.; McGinnis, E.; Rix, J.
>   Author Affil:  Digital Equipment Corp., Geneva, Switzerland
>   Source: Comput. Graph. Forum (Netherlands)  vol.7, no.4,    pp.: 347-54
>   Publication Year: Dec. 1988
>   (29 Refs)
>   Abstract:  GKS,  GKS-3D, and PHIGS are all approved ISO standards for the
> application  programmer  interface.  How  do system analysts or programmers
> decide which standard to use for their application? The authors discuss the
> range  of  application  requirements  likely to be encountered, explore the
> suitability  of  GKS and PHIGS for satisfying these requirements, and offer
> guidelines to aid in the decision process. 

I know I've seen other overviews of graphics standards. Just none recently.

There are a couple of books on CGM and GKS, but I do not have the
references written down.

As, for PHIGS, you can get the standard itself from ANSI in New York.
212-642-4900, 11 West 42nd Street, NY, NY 10036.  [The following table
gives the ANSI standard numbers corresponding to the PHIGS standards:

	ANSI X3.144-1988	ISO 9592 parts 1, 2 and 3 for PHIGS
	ANSI X3.144.1		ISO 9593-1 for PHIGS FORTAN binding
	ANSI X3.144.3		ISO 9593-3 for PHIGS Ada binding
	ANSI X3.144.4		ISO 9593-4 for PHIGS C binding

--RT]  They will also have the GKS and CGM specs.

-Jan "YON" Hardenbergh       jch@stardent.com         (508)-371-9810x261
Stardent Computer, 6 N.E. Tech Center, 521 Virginia Rd,Concord, MA 01742

-----
Subject: 11) PHIGS/PEX books
From: jch@adbeta9.prime.com (Jan Hardenbergh )
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1993 00:31:21 GMT
Summary:  lots of PHIGS and PEX books out there.
Id:  <CCr5G9.28q@cvbnet.CV.COM>

I'm perhaps not the best judge, since I have them all (or will soon) and
have a trial membership to the authors club, where we all chum around
together :-)

But if your job is actually to work with either PHIGS or PEX, SPEND the
$200+ or so to get many of the books here. It's a tiny investment in
your career, especially if you get reimbursed! If you are the type that
only wants one book on a subject, go to a bookstore and look carefully
at which one you want, after all, you can't judge a book by its email.

The books I'd buy again appear in order of appearance.

PHIGS Books
===========

Toby Howard et al. "A Practical Introduction to PHIGS and PHIGS PLUS"
Addison-Wesley 1991, ISBN 0-201-41641-7
  A "great" small book on PHIGS.  Covers almost everything, but briefly.
  Not good to program from, but if your question is what is PHIGS, this
  will be the best place to start for most people.

Tom Gaskins. "PHIGS Programming Manual", O'Reilly 1992, 
	ISBN 0-937175-92-7 (casebound)  ISBN 0-937175-85-4 (soft)
  This is the most comprehensive and the best to program from for Sun
  and any PEX-SI based PHIGS product. Tom knows this stuff inside and out.

Joseph E Kasper and David Arns."Graphics Programming with PHIGS and PHIGS-PLUS"
HP Press/Addison Wesley, ISBN 0-201-56343-6
  A book more oriented to the standard than Gaskins' book, It has
  both FORTRAN and "C" and uses new binding. Especially good for HP.

John W. Blake. "PHIGS + PHIGS+, An Introduction to 3D Computer Graphics"
Acedemic Press/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. ISBN 0.12.103515.8
(only from 24-28 Oval Road, London, NWI 7DX, UK //  Lbs 29.95 ??)
  I'm buying it, sight unseen...

"PHIGS Reference Manual", O'Reilly 1992, Edited by Rich Ellis & ...
 ISBN 0-937175-91-9
  Man Pages (improved version of the PEX-SI man pages)

Hopgood & Duce, "A Primer for PHIGS" John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
ISBN: 471 93042 3 (no PHIGS-PLUS)
  Some useful notions on structure editing.

W.A. Gaman, W.A. Giovinazzo, "PHIGS by Example", Springer-Verlag,
ISBN 0-387-97555-1

PEX Books
=========

Tom Gaskins' "PEXlib Programming Manual", O'Reilly 1992, ISBN 0-56592-028-7
  This is a great book.

Paula Womack, PEXlib: A Tutorial, Prentice Hall 1993 (printing, due October)
ISBN 013-015843-7.
  Sight unseen. Paula was document editor for PEX 5.1, I'd bet it's great.

Mark Graff, PEXlib: A Reference Manual, Prentice Hall, ISBN 013-176066-1, 
  Sight unseen.

"PEXlib Reference Manual", O'Reilly 1992,  ISBN 1-56592-029-5
  Man pages for PEXlib SI,  with intro by Tom Gaskins.

...and one more...
Jan Hardenbergh, Building Applications with PEXlib, Prentice Hall, (December)
ISBN 013-012535-0.
  I've seen too much of this to be impartial! I like it. 

My conscience is clean (still) about using the internet for commercial gain.
I've been sending out these lists of PHIGS books since before I had even
thought of writing one. But at this point I'll stop because I think it is
a gray area. I hope someone else will take it up. Joe?

Opinions expressed are my own, my employer uses HOOPS!
Jan "YON" Hardenbergh     - jch@cvbnet.cv.com -      617-275-1800x3275
Computervision Corp.        MS 5-2, 14 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A. Einstein - Thank God!
-----

Subject: 12) Articles on PEX
From: klee@wsl.dec.com (Ken Lee)
Date: 12 Aug 91 17:06:05 GMT
References: <1991Aug12.100605@wsl.dec.com>

Clifford, William, John McConnell, and Jeffrey Friedberg, "The Development
     of PEX, A Three-dimensional Graphics Extension to X11," in Proceedings
     of Eurographics'88, September, 1988.  An overview PEX, an extension to
     the X protocol to support PHIGS+.

Rost, Randi, Jeffrey Friedberg, and Peter Nishimoto, "PEX:  A Network-
     Transparent 3D Graphics System," IEEE Computer Graphics & Applica-
     tions, pp. 14-26, July, 1989.  A good overview of PEX, the
     PHIGS/PHIGS+ 3D extension to X. A complete PEX is currently being
     developed by Sun under contract to the MIT X Consortium and is
     scheduled to be publicly available in 1991.

Stroyan, Michael, "Three-Dimensional Graphics Using the X Window System,"
     Dr. Dobb's Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 28-36, February, 1990.  A high
     level description of various approaches to developing 3D graphics
     tools for X, including those of the PHIGS Extension to X (PEX) and
     HP's Starbase-on-X11 (sox11).

Sung, Hsien Ching Kelvin, Greg Rogers, and William Kubitz, "A Critical
     Evaluation of PEX," IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, vol. 10,
     no. 6, pp. 65-75, November, 1990.  An evaluation of PEX, the X exten-
     sion to support PHIGS, from the point of view of a PHIGS implementor.

Thomas, Spencer W. and Martin Friedmann, "PEX - A 3-D Extension to X Win-
     dows," in Proceedings of the Winter, 1989 USENIX Conference, pp. 139-
     149.  Describes a demonstration implementation of PEX, the
     PHIGS/PHIGS+ 3D extension to X. A complete PEX is currently being
     developed by Sun under contract to the MIT X Consortium and is
     scheduled to be publically available in 1991.

-----
Subject: 13)  PEX Application Programmer Interfaces (APIs)
From: thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu (Rich Thomson)
Date: Tue Mar  2 22:27:37 MST 1993

When discussing PEX, it is important not to confuse the protocol with
the API, or application programmer interface.  The API is the
conceptual model of 3D graphics that the application developer sees.
The protocol is generated by the API and is interpreted by the server
to perform graphics requests on behalf of the client program.

One API provided with the R5 PEX-SI is a PHIGS/PHIGS-PLUS API.  The
PHIGS/PHIGS-PLUS standards are specified in two parts.  First, a
functional description describes each operation conceptually, in a
language-independent manner.  Second, language bindings are used to
bind the particular PHIGS functions to the semantics of the language.
The PEX-SI comes with an application programmer interface that
conforms with the latest revision of the PHIGS/PHIGS-PLUS C language
binding.

Bob Schulte of SHOGraphics had this to say about their GL-like API
called PEXtk:

    Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.pex
    From: rws@shograf.com (Bob Schulte)
    Subject: Re: difference between PEX and GL
    Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1993 16:03:42 GMT

    PEXtk is complete and available now directly from export.mit.lcs.edu,
    and is located in /contrib. The files are pextk.PS.tar.Z, pextk.README,
    and pextk.tar.Z.  It is Free.

    Depending on how you write a GL program and what features you use
    it may or may not be difficult to port to PEXtk. It would certainly
    be easier than porting to PHIGS.

    For example PEXtk uses X as its windowing system, so the UI is X
    based. We have not attempted to duplicate any GL windowing functions.

    Bob
    --
    Bob Schulte,        E-Mail: rws@shograf.com    Voice: (408) 524-4015
    SHOgraphics.        Performance Through PEX


If your version of R5 is patched through patch #22, you have a second
MIT supplied API called "PEXlib".  PEXlib is to the PEX protocol what
Xlib is to the core X protocol.  PEXlib provides an interface that is
as close as possible to a one-to-one correspondence between functions
and protocol requests.  It is intended to be a systems programming
interface (i.e. people developing graphics toolkits and graphics
systems will implement their system on top of PEXlib).  It is proposed
that the PHIGS API be ported to PEXlib once PEXlib is finalized.  This
change would not affect programs written to the existing PHIGS API.
However, since PEXlib is intimately tied to the protocol, it is
expected that there will be changes between the current PEXlib (which
supports version 5.0 and 5.1 of the PEX protocol) and the PEXlib that
supports the next major version of the PEX protocol, version 6.0.
Naturally, every attempt will be made to make the changes to the API
minimal.  The nature of the changes from 5.1 to 6.0 are not such that
every primitive will be affected; rather the changes deal with the
sticky problems of subsets, multi-buffering, and other issues of
global rendering semantics.

The future may contain other popular graphics APIs (SGI's GL, HP's
Starbase, Stardent's Dore') that also generate the PEX protocol.

						-- Rich
-----
Subject: 14)  PHIGS Toolkit -- a portable toolkit for PHIGS programmers
From: Gareth Williams <williamj@computer-science.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 93 08:56:20 GMT
Message-Id: <9302080856.AA04031@r3i.cs.man.ac.uk>

                     THE PHIGS TOOLKIT

     A PORTABLE TOOLKIT FOR PHIGS APPLICATION PROGRAMMERS

            *************************************
            **** NEW RELEASE VERSION 3.2 FOR ****
            ****       SunPHIGS 2.0          ****
            ****       HP PHIGS 2.2          ****
            **** ##    IBM graPHIGS 1.02  ## ****
            ****         PEX-SI              ****
            *************************************

We are pleased to announce the availability of version 3.2 of the PHIGS
Toolkit, a portable toolkit for PHIGS application Programmers. The PHIGS
Toolkit has been developed at the University of Manchester, UK, and is
funded by the Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC) and the
Advisory Group on Computer Graphics (AGOCG). The Toolkit is based on the
experience of the developers who have been active PHIGS programmers for
several years and were also involved in the ISO technical review of PHIGS
and PHIGS PLUS.

Following the release in September this year of version 3.1 of the PHIGS
Toolkit, version 3.2 is now available which supports SunPHIGS 2.0,
HP PHIGS 2.2, IBM graPHIGS 1.02 and MIT's PEX-SI.

MAIN FEATURES OF THE TOOLKIT
----------------------------

 o comprehensive transformations library
 o automatic drawing of structure network hierarchy diagrams
 o automatic drawing of structure content diagrams
 o interactive CSS debugger
 o interactive view editor
 o window system implemented using PHIGS structures
 o interactive PHIGS Interpreter
 o comprehensive colour model support library
 o menu system to extend PHIGS input

 o Runs with C and FORTRAN for SunPHIGS on SunOS
 o Runs with C for HP PHIGS on HP-UX
 o Runs with C for graPHIGS on AIX
 o Runs with C for PEX-SI on SunOS
 o Runs with C and FORTRAN for DEC PHIGS on VAX/VMS (PTK 2.0 only)

 o full source code provided
 o demonstration programs provided
 o comprehensive documentation

WHAT IS THE PHIGS TOOLKIT?
--------------------------

The purpose of the PHIGS Toolkit is to help application programmers to
program more effectively and securely using PHIGS. The functionality
provided by PHIGS is low-level, and the PHIGS Toolkit provides a number of
tools of various levels of complexity in order to make programming with
PHIGS quicker, and less painful.  To the programmer, it is as if the
functions provided by PHIGS have been supplemented with a set of additional
functions, and a typical application will use both `raw' PHIGS functions as
well as PHIGS Toolkit functions.  A convenient way to view the Toolkit is
as a layer of software which sits `on top of' PHIGS.

Tools in the PHIGS Toolkit are divided into two categories: PROGRAMMING
TOOLS, and HIGH-LEVEL TOOLS.  Programming tools are generally quite simple
single-purpose procedures, and are designed to help applications
programmers to construct PHIGS programs more quickly and reliably. The
high-level tools are more powerful, and provide programmers with means for
visualising and debugging structure networks.

PROGRAMMING TOOLS
-----------------

 o the Transformations Library -- functions for
   constructing and manipulating coordinate transformations.

 o the HashStrings Library -- functions which enable text
   strings to be used in situations where integers would normally
   be required.

 o the PHIGS Utilities Library -- utility functions,
   providing operations (such as `copy element') which are not directly
   provided by PHIGS, as well as common sequences of PHIGS function calls
   `bundled up' into single functions.

 o the PHIGS Traversal State List Library -- functions for
   controlling and inquiring a simulated structure network traversal.

 o the Colour Library -- functions for defining colour
   values using English words and phrases, and for interchangeably
   manipulating colours using various colour models.

 o the PHIGS Textual Interpreter (Phinter) -- a tool for reading textual
   PHIGS scripts. Phinter may be used interactively with a PHIGS string device
   or standard input.

HIGH-LEVEL TOOLS
----------------

 o the PHIGS Structure Content Drawer -- a tool to generate diagrams
   showing which elements structures contain.  The diagrams are themselves
   PHIGS structures, with a documented format.

 o the PHIGS Topology Library -- functions for
   automatically generating diagrams representing the topology of PHIGS
   structure networks. The diagrams are themselves PHIGS structures, with a
   documented format.

 o the PHIGS Menus Library -- functions for constructing
   and manipulating menus built using PHIGS structures.

 o the PHIGS Windows Library -- functions for displaying
   and viewing PHIGS structure networks in windows.

 o the PHIGS Debugger -- a tool (modelled after conventional
   programming language debuggers) for simulating the traversal of structure
   networks. The traversal may be stepped through incrementally and the state
   of the traversal inquired at any stage.

 o the PHIGS View Editor -- a utility for interactively editing and
   experimenting with viewing parameters for a scene.

PHIGS TOOLKIT INFORMATION   ** REGISTER NOW **
----------------------------------------------

We would like to encourage all people interested in the PHIGS Toolkit to
register as PHIGS Toolkit users. This will ensure that all PHIGS Toolkit
users will receive notice of new versions, course dates, bug reports and
any other useful information.  Please send the following information to
phigstoolkit@cs.man.ac.uk.

   Name:
   Organisation:
   email:
   Telephone/FAX:
   PHIGS implementations used:

Even if the PHIGS Toolkit is not currently available for your particular
PHIGS implementation, please register. We are currently working on ports to
several other PHIGS implementations and it would be very useful to know
what the demand is for different versions.

HOW TO OBTAIN THE PHIGS TOOLKIT
-------------------------------

The PHIGS Toolkit is available from two sites in the UK:

PTK from Kent
-------------

The PHIGS Toolkit is available from HENSA (Higher Education National 
Software Archive) at the University of Kent.

The HENSA Service at the University of Kent can be accessed in a number 
of ways:

Interactive
-----------

There is a friendly interactive interface which has a useful find
utility for locating software.  Connect to unix.hensa.ac.uk and log
in as "archive" for an interactive interface to the HENSA archive.  
Connections can be made using telnet (unix.hensa.ac.uk) and X.29 
across JANET (uk.ac.hensa.unix, DTE 000049200900).

anonymous ftp
-------------

Using DARPA FTP connect to the machine unix.hensa.ac.uk and
login as "anonymous", giving your email address as the password.

guest NI-FTP]
Using Blue Book NI-FTP with the following:

address: uk.ac.hensa.unix
login: guest
path: <ARCHIVE>/filename

eg. 	% fcp -b "<ARCHIVE>/uunet/ls-lR.Z"@uk.ac.hensa.unix ls-lR.Z
User name on uk.ac.hensa.unix? guest
Password on uk.ac.hensa.unix? jn@ukc.ac.uk

email server
------------

Send a message to "archive@unix.hensa.ac.uk" containing the 
string "help" for details on how to use it.

Any general queries regarding the HENSA service at The University of
Kent should be directed to hensa@unix.hensa.ac.uk, queries specific to
the Netlib service should be sent to netlib-admin@unix.hensa.ac.uk and
stuff concerning the source archive to archive-admin@unix.hensa.ac.uk.

The relevant files for the PHIGS Toolkit on HENSA are:

PTK 3.2     /misc/unix/phigstk/PhigsToolkit3.2.tar.Z 
                                      for SunPHIGS 2.0 on SunOS, 
                                          HP PHIGS 2.2 on HP-UX,
                                          graPHIGS 1.02 on AIX,
                                          PEX-SI on SunOS.

PTK 2.0    /misc/unix/phigstk/PhigsToolkit.tar.Z 
                                      for SunPHIGS 1.x on SunOS.
           /misc/vms/phigstk/ptk.hex for DEC PHIGS 2.3A on VAX/VMS.

PTK from Manchester
-------------------

  By anonymous ftp from uk.ac.mcc.hpb. (130.88.200.7) 
  Username "anonymous", and your network address as password.
  The files are:

PTK 3.2     pub/cgu/ptk/ptk3.2.tar.Z for SunPHIGS 2.0 on SunOS, 
                                  HP PHIGS 2.2 on HP-UX,
                                  graPHIGS 1.02 on AIX,
                                  PEX-SI on SunOS.

PTK 2.0     pub/cgu/ptk/ptk.tar.Z for SunPHIGS 1.x on SunOS.

            pub/cgu/ptk/ptk.shar* for DEC PHIGS 2.3A on VMS.

(
For VMS the Toolkit is stored as a collection of SHAR files.
There are 288 files in total, each 15K in size.
They are called ptk.shar_X where X is 1 ... 288.
To rebuild the Toolkit directory structure the
files must be concatenated together and run as a command file.

   $ copy ptk.shar_%, ptk.shar_%%, ptk.shar_%%% ptk.shar
   $ @ptk.shar
)

PTK by Magnetic Tape
--------------------

Send a 1/4 inch cartridge for SunOS, and a 1/2 inch open reel magnetic tape
for VMS to:

Tim Hopkins
Computing Laboratory
University of Kent
email: trh@uk.ac.ukc

or

Toby Howard
Department of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
United Kingom
Tel: +44 61 275 6274
Fax: +44 61 275 6236
email: toby@uk.ac.man.cs

PHIGS TOOLKIT TRAINING COURSE
-----------------------------

A training course for users of the PHIGS Toolkit was held at the
University of Manchester on September 23rd 1992. Course materials
including four programming exercises and three step-through
tutorials are provided in this release of the Toolkit.

FUTURE WORK
-----------

The first phase of the PHIGS Toolkit does not include support for PHIGS
PLUS. Work is now underway to expand the Toolkit to include extensive
support for PHIGS PLUS functions, and the expanded PHIGS Toolkit will be
released in April 1993. 

A toolkit providing support for NURBS curves and surfaces has also
been developed at Manchester, and is designed to be complementary to 
the PHIGS Toolkit. It is available from the same sites as PTK.

BETA TEST
---------

We are currently looking for beta testers for the PHIGS PLUS extensions 
and the test will start in the new year and finish at the end of February 
1993. A short report will be required from testers. Please get in touch 
if you are interested in being a tester.

Toby Howard, Terry Hewitt, Gareth Williams, Steve Larkin, David Yip
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom


-----
Subject: 15)  Why doesn't HLHSR mode (Z buffering) work with the PEX-SI?
From: Rich Thomson <thomson@jensen.cs.utah.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 28 14:14:49 MST 1994

Sorry, the PEX-SI doesn't have any support for hidden line and hidden
surface removal (HLHSR), commonly implemented through Z buffering.
The PEX-SI team decided that since Z buffering is very device specific
they would leave it up to each vendor to implement Z buffering support
for the first release.

It is planned to provide software Z buffer HLHSR support in the
PEX-SI, probably in the R6 release.

The PHIGS standard allows an implementation to provide only HLHSR mode
NONE and still be a conformant implementation of the standard.  This
is probably a leftover from the days of calligraphic and storage-scope
type displays which don't have Z buffers or other HLHSR removal methods
in hardware (except hardware-based sorting for hidden-line removal).

						-- Rich
-- 
--
    ``Read my MIPs -- no new VAXes!!''  --George Bush after sniffing freon
Rich Thomson					thomson@asylum.utah.edu
