  ===========================================================================
  Article taken from the Maryland - Delaware - Virginia - West Virginia FISH
  FINDER & Hunting News - October 1990.
  ===========================================================================
                        Some Thoughts for an Anti-Hunter

     You've been pretty quiet recently.  At least at the local level.  But the
  winds are shifting more frequently to the north now, and there's a hint of
  autumn in the air.  Not much.  But enough to tickle the spines of those for
  whom hunting and its rich tradition mold a way of life.

     Soon the guns will begin popping-mostly dove hunters in the grain fields,
  but also a few echos from the rail marshes.  Those milder reports from the
  hickory groves will be .22 rifle fans plinking away at evasive gray
  squirrels.  Welcome sounds to hunters who have suffered through a hot and
  humid summer.

     Sights and sounds to arouse you from your long slumber.  Pretty soon
  you'll be pecking away at your typewriter and cranking out twisted sentences
  and shallow paragraphs putting down hunters and hunting.  Many of your
  possibly well-intentioned misconceptions will make the editorial pages
  across Virginia.

     Do you really understand what you are trying to accomplish?  I don't
  think you will be, but let's suppose for a moment you are successful.  
  Hunting is outlawed in Virginia.  Will all hunters accept that?  Have you
  thought that through?  Looked at the consequences?

     An immediate loss would be the crack law enforcement force and the
  dedicated game biologists of the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.  
  There would be no money to pay their salaries, purchase patrol cars, and
  provide biological support these highly trained professionals need to
  protect those deer, ducks, turkeys, and other critters you insist hunters
  are destroying.

                                Bearing the Cost

     Are you and your fellow anti-hunters willing to assume that financial
  load, to cough up anywhere from $5 to $50 each to match the money hunters
  shell out annually for licenses, permits, stamps, and tags for the privilege
  of hunting in Virginia?  That money is needed to manage the state's wildlife
  resources and to protect it from illegal hunters.  It's no small amount.  
  Last year hunters paid $9,640,465 for various kinds of licenses or permits.

     Here we are talking about Virginia alone.  Nationally, the figure was
  $400,000,000.  Over the years hunters have shouldered the burden of paying
  for the nations conservation programs.  And you would eliminate that?

     In Virginia approximately 400,000 hunters carry the load.  And they do so
  willingly for the most part.  Oh, there are always a few who grumble when
  the costs of hunting licenses are jacked-but never the serious hunter.

     Would the average taxpayer, many of whom do not hunt, be willing to
  assume the financial responsibility?

                           No Protection for Wildlife

     Conservation programs supported by hunter's money provide for all
  wildlife, not just for game species.  Bird watching is a growing outdoor
  recreation, and a healthy one.  Songbirds benefit from game habitat
  improvement and they are protected from hunting.  But who's there to hand
  out a ticket when some unscrupulous person shoots a songbird?  The
  hunter-supported warden, of course.  And you would take away this protection
  for the birds you profess a love for?

     Picture, if you can, a Virginia November when there is no hunting.  
  Hunting has been banned and law-abiding hunters have put away their guns.  
  But poachers haven't.  They've always ignored the law, but now there are no
  wardens to apprehend them.  Is this the goal you are seeking?

     And no biologist to halt an epidemic that's hammering the deer
  populations... I could go on.

     I don't think you'll win, Mr. Anti-Hunter.  Your case is too weak.
  ===========================================================================
