From: ir227@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark C. Craig)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.usa,alt.politics.reform,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.usa.congress
Subject: Govt. Conspiracy to Turn US Over to UN!
Date: 12 Apr 1997 09:50:15 GMT
Message-ID: <5inlsn$v3@alexander.INS.CWRU.Edu>

      DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277, DISARMAMENT SERIES 5

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR
GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful
world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and
international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law;
a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under
effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change
takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets
forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct
their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their
reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to
preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace
Force;
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all
weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than
those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining
internal order;
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international
agreements, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the
principles of the United Nations;
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament
Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure
compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES
The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a
detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their
efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To
this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the
earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to
progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those
immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations
and that could facilitate and form port of the total program.
GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the
negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively
strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international
security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in
stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time,
with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all
measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as
soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have
been made;
Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out
scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed
forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the
disarmament process;  and
Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the
security of any state.
In the interest of peace, many Americans have been persuaded to support
disarmament programs and to create as a substitute for each nation's
military a United Nations Peace Force. Most feel certain that their own
rights and the independence of their nation would in no way be placed in
jeopardy. But there is a vital question few seem willing or able to ask:
Who would be left to restrain the all-powerful United Nations?
For his Secretaries of State and Defense, President John F. Kennedy
selected Dean Rusk and Robert S. McNamara. Each was a member of the New
York-based Council on Foreign Relations, a private organization formed in
1921 for the purpose of bringing about a one-world government.
Only nine months into his administration - on September 25, 1961, to be
precise - Mr. Kennedy travelled to UN headquarters in New York to present
a proposal entitled Freedom From War: The United States Program For
General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The work of the
Rusk-led State Department, with the willing acquiescence of the
McNamara-led Defense Department, the proposal was published as "Department
of State Publication 7277."
In his remarks before the UN, President Kennedy asked for a commitment
from all nations "not to an arms race, but to a peace race - to advance
together step by step, stage by stage, until general and complete
disarmament has been achieved."  He did not get any such commitment, yet
the United States embarked on the Kennedy-launched program.
Freedom From War (or "7277," as it is frequently called) proposes three
stages of disarmament ending with the transfer of the armed forces of our
nation to the United Nations. As Senator Joseph Clark of Pennsylvania
approvingly reminded his colleagues in a Senate speech on March 1, 1962,
this program is "the fixed, determined and approved policy of the
government of the United States."
A reading of the document itself confirms that disarmament "would proceed
to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the
progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force...." In other words, the only
significant military power left in the world would be the United Nations.
The provisions of the treacherous proposal would actually leave our nation
defenseless before the UN, and before any other nation that didn't
similarly disarm. And it would place the UN's superior military power in
the hands of the UN's Undersecretary for Political and Security Council
Affairs, the overseer of all UN military activity. This post, by virtue of
a secret agreement concluded at the founding of the UN (an arrangement
later confirmed by an astonished former UN Secretary General named Trygve
Lie), has always been held by a communist. The man who holds it today, is
Vasiliy S. Safronchuk of the Soviet Union. Unless our leaders are stopped,
they will succeed in turning over our military forces to the United
Nations where they will be controlled by a communist.
Since the UN was created, there have been 14 Undersecretaries for
Political and Security Council Affairs. All have been communists, and
all but one have come from the Soviet Union.
1946-1949 Arkady Sobolev             1963-1965 V.P. Suslov
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
1949-1953 Konstantin Zinchenko       1965-1968 Alexei E. Nesterenko
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
1953-1954 Ilya Tchernychev           1968-1973 Leonid N. Kutakov
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
1954-1957 Dragoslav Protitch         1973-1978 Arkady N. Shevchenko
         (Yugoslavia)                         (USSR)
1958-1960 Anatoly Dobrynin           1978-1981 Mikhail D. Styenko
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
1960-1962 Georgy Arkadev             1981-1986 Viacheslav A. Ustinov
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
1962-1963 E.D. Kiselev               1987-     Vasiliy S. Safronchuk
         (USSR)                               (USSR)
Subverting Our Sovereignty
Are our leaders really implementing this plan?  Yes, they are! The Nuclear
Test Ban Treaty is part of it; the treaty banning the use of outer space
for nuclear weapons is part of it; the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is
part of it; and so is the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, signed
by President Reagan and Soviet leader Gorbachev and ratified by the U.S.
Senate in 1988.
When Freedom From War was first made public, many startled Americans tried
to obtain a copy. It was quickly declared "out of print" by federal
authorities. Then, it was superseded in April 1962 by a "more precise"
statement of the U.S.  disarmament policy in a document entitled Blueprint
For the Peace Race: Outline of Basic Provisions of a Treaty on General and
Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
Presented formally to an 18-nation UN Committee on Disarmament meeting in
Geneva, the foreword to the Blueprint states that it doesn't cancel the
plans given in Freedom From War. It merely "elaborates and extends the
proposals of September 25," the date that Freedom From War was unveiled at
UN headquarters by President Kennedy. In complete accord with Freedom From
War, the Blueprint spells out its overall goal in the third of its three
stages: "The Parties to the Treaty would progressively strengthen the
United Nations Peace Force established in Stage II until it had sufficient
armed forces and armaments so that no state could challenge it."
When questioned about the commitment of the United States to the
Blueprint, A. Richard Richstein, General Council of the U.S. Arms Control
and Disarmament Agency, stated in a May 11, 1982 letter that "the United
States has never formally withdrawn this proposal." In January 1991,
William Nary, the official; historian of the Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency, confirmed again that "the proposal has not been withdrawn." Mr.
Nary also confirmed that "certain features of it have been incorporated
into subsequent disarmament agreements."
In summary, the plan to disarm the United States in favor of an
all-powerful United Nations Peace Force is unfolding. It calls for
relinquishing virtually all of our nation's military forces to a UN
command whose leader, by agreement between the U.S. and the USSR during
the founding sessions leading to the creation of the UN, will always be a
communist. In the end, "no state could challenge" the communist-led
military power of the United Nations.
This supposed "disarmament" program, therefore, is not as much about
weapons elimination as it is about weapons distribution and control. If
the program succeeds, only the UN and those nations skirting UN weapons
prohibitions will be armed. It is remarkably similar to the drive that
would outlaw private ownership of firearms. (emphasis added) If that drive
should ever succeed, only the government and those who are outlaws would
possess guns. Law-abiding citizens would be at their mercy in the latter
case; law-abiding nations would be at the mercy of the UN and outlaw
nations in the other.
How did we get into such a situation? Who are the individuals promoting
such a suicidal proposal? Why is Congress going along instead of
repudiating this dangerous program? How do we get out of it before it's
too late?
At the founding of the United Nations in 1945, the delegation from the
United States included a young State Department official named Alger Hiss.
Widely acclaimed for both his ability and his enthusiasm for the world
organization, he rose to become the acting secretary general of the
founding UN conference. As a member of the steering and executive
committees of the conference, he played a major role in drafting the UN
Charter. He also helped to staff the U.S. delegation and was chosen by his
peers for the prestigious task of personally transporting the Charter to
the President and to the Senate for ratification.
Alger Hiss, however, was later found to have been a secret communist, more
loyal to a foreign power than to the nation of his birth. A 1950 State
department document named 15 other key U.S. government officials who were
responsible for planning the creation of the UN. They, too, were
subsequently named as secret communists by official agencies.
Five years after the 1945 founding of the United nations, official records
released by the State Department# identified the individuals listed below
as key U.S. contributors to the planning for the world organization. Each
of the 16 was subsequently identified in sworn testimony before U.S.
government agencies as a secret communist.
Alger Hiss                         Nathan Gregory Silvermaster
Harry Dexter White                 Harold Glasser
Virginius Frank Coe                Victor Perlo
Noel Field                         Irving Kaplan
Laurence Duggan                    Solomon Adler
Henry Julian Wadleigh              Abraham George Silverman
John Carter Vincent                William K. Ullman
David Weintraub                    William H. Taylor
Not only was the U.S. represented by a sizable number of communists, our
nation's delegation also contained 43 individuals who were then or soon
would be members of America's leading Establishment organization, the
privately-run Council on Foreign Relations. Alger Hiss himself was both a
communist and a CFR member as was another U.S. member of the UN planning
team, Lauchlin Currie. As communists, and as CFR members, they worked
diligently to bring the world government into existence, and they labored
just as hard to have the United States a part of it.
There were, of course, delegations from the USSR and the other founding
nations.  These were made up of communists, socialists, one-worlders, and
easily manipulated starry-eyed dreamers. All were committed to world
government at the expense of national sovereignty. All wanted the United
Nations to be supreme.  There was to be no more war as soon as the United
Nations was given sufficient power, especially unchallenged military
power, to keep the peace.
For the past 45 years, intense pro-UN propaganda has convinced many
Americans (and many others as well) that the words "peace" and "United
Nations" are virtually interchangeable. Anyone who opposes the UN risks
being labelled a warmonger.  Those who support the UN customarily find
themselves showered with accolades.
Peace is so universally desired that almost anything seems reasonable to
achieve it. Proposals to empower the UN with the world's dominant military
capability have received widespread support. At first glance, the idea may
seem to have some merit. A world police force formed to keep the peace.
Wouldn't it be wonderful!
Suppose, however, that the unchallengeable power of the United Nations
fill into the wrong hands? Suppose it ended up at the disposal of Alger
Hiss and his comrades? Couldn't it be used to impose a tyranny on the rest
of mankind?  Wouldn't any would-be tyrant gravitate to the organization?
Even if the UN wire not run by communists, socialists, and one-worlders
who despise nationhood, wouldn't the awesome power we are talking about be
sufficient to corrupt anyone? Who would be able to bridle any UN leaders
who had been given greater power than anyone else on earth?
It can't be said too often that America is unique. Our nation began with
the thunderous assertion in the Declaration of Independence that
"men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights."
According to the founding premise of this nation, rights come from God,
not from government. And the declaration then declared that governments
are formed solely "to secure those rights." That's all! Secure God-given
rights, not provide for wants, redistribute the wealth, or make dependent
serfs out of the people.
With the marvelous foundation laid in the Declaration, the men who formed
this unique and wonderful nation the wrote a Constitution whose sole
purpose was to govern the government, not the people. America was expected
to be a nation where the government was limited by law and the people were
limited by freely accepted moral codes such as those found in the Ten
Commandments.
Nothing like America had ever existed in all history. And did this nation
prosper! Millions left the old world to come here penniless - not to be
cared for but to enjoy freedom and opportunity. America became the hope of
the world - even for these who were not fortunate enough to live within
our borders.
The United Nations, on the other hand, has no place for God. If rights
don't come from God, the presumption is that they are granted by
government. The UN actually fosters such a presumption, as can be
discovered in its International Covenants on Human Rights.
What must be understood is that a government that presumes to grant
fundamental rights - which is what the UN does - is a government that can
suspend them at will. If the "self evident " truths in the Declaration of
Independence are canceled or forgotten in favor of the UN's ways, all
rights given us by our Creator will exist only at the extremely dubious
pleasure of the United Nations.
The reality here is that the UN turns the entire American system on its
head. To consider submitting our nation to the dictates of the
anti-American, pro-communist and Godless United Nations is suicidal. Yet,
this is exactly what our leaders have been working towards for several
decades. Sad to say, it is perfectly obvious that this is precisely what
President Bush is talking about when he repeatedly expresses his desire to
create a "new world order."
Unfortunately, the desire for peace has clouded the vision of many
otherwise clear-thinking Americans. Many have been persuaded to think only
of the concept of "peace," but not what kind of peace. No one should ever
forget that there is the peace of the grave, the peace of submission, and
the communist peace that consists of no opposition to communism. Peace
with justice, the goal of anyone possessing good will, is as likely under
United Nations domination as is the chance that water will flow uphill.
Whenever thoughts such as these are brought to the attention of sensible
Americans, enthusiasm for UN-style peace diminishes rapidly. "Let's keep
our independence!" is a common response. "Why should we trust others to
look after our well-being?" is another. But too few are aware of the
dangers inherent in an all-powerful world government. And too few,
therefore, have been guarding against transferring U.S. military forces
and U.S. sovereignty to the United Nations.
In an exclusive interview published in the December 31, 1990/January 7,
1991 issue of U.S. News and World Report, President Bush called for "a
reinvigorated United Nations" that he hoped would bring about the "new
world order." What should be reinvigorated instead are the U.S.
Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
During a January 9, 1991 press conference, Mr. Bush said that the crisis
in the Middle East "has to do with a new world order [that] is only going
to be enhanced if this newly activated peacekeeping function of the United
Nations proves to be effective." Obviously, he considers our forces in the
Middle East to have been under the UN's peacekeeping jurisdiction. And
isn't it curious that this supposed "peace"  organization's authority was
used in starting the war in the Middle East?
Then, in his January 19, 1991 speech to the nation, the President again
touted the "new world order," describing it as "an order in which a
credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the
promise and vision of the UN's founders." He didn't remind anyone that the
UN's founders were communists, socialists, one-worlders, and starry-eyed
dreamers who would happily tear down the unique foundations of the United
States and replace them with the UN Charter.
Answers to some of the questions we have already raised, and to others
that anyone reading this pamphlet must have, begin with an understanding
of the grip on America held by the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Bush,
a member of the CFR's Board of Directors as recently as 1979, can point to
more than 350 CFR members currently serving as U.S. Government officials.
A similar CFR dominance prevailed during the Reagan years and in several
previous administrations.
Current U.S. Officials holding membership in the CFR include Secretary of
Defense Cheney, National Security Advisor Scowcroft, Joint Chiefs Chairman
Powell, CIA Director Webster, and Deputy Secretary of State Eagleburger.
Don't expect any to block further entanglement of the United States in the
UN.
There are also 16 U.S. senators and a like number of U.S. representatives
who hold membership in this organization. Don't expect them to protect our
nation from UN domination.
Realize too, that practically nationally important organ of the news media
is led by a CFR member. Any senator or representative who wishes to
receive favor from the media goes along with subverting America to
internationalist goals. Any senator or representative who tries to keep
our nation independent runs the risk of having the media make him seem
like a lunatic.
The great majority of the American people who value their freedom and
their nation's independence have to become informed and alarmed about the
path down which we are being taken. There will be no change without a
rising tide of indignation. And there will be no rising tide of
indignation until the frightening details about the ongoing subversion of
this nation have been placed in the hands of many more Americans.
Happily, there are reliable sources of information both about President
George Bush's commitment to his "new world order" and about the Council on
Foreign Relations itself. We highly recommend two books:
1. The Establishment's Man, by James J. Drummey, a tastefully written yet
devastating expose' of the political career of George Bush;
2. The Shadows of Power, by James Perloff, a history of the Council on Foreign
Relations taken from its own papers and publications.
The enemy is within the gates of our great land. Those who would deliver
out nation to a UN-controlled "new world order" have achieved great power
and influence. Whether they are stopped in time is up to individuals who
will read a pamphlet like this one, books like those recommended above,
and a great deal more information that is available to anyone. Once
informed, an American worthy of the name will work with others to throw
the rascals out of office, and, in the words of George Washington, "put
none but Americans" in charge of guarding this nation.
The following material was prepared and distributed by Bernadine
Smith of the Second Amendment Committee, P.O. Box 1776, Hanford,CA 93232,
telephone (209) 584-5209.
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
ARE VOTING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR FIREARMS?
If you want to know why, go to your local library, no matter where you
live in the United States.  Tell the librarian to show you where the
United States Code books are shelved.  There are 25 books in the set.
They are reddish-brown in color.  They are printed by the Government
Printing Office in Washington, DC. These hard-covered books are printed
every 8-10 years.  They are updated with annual soft-back supplements each
year until a new hard-cover issue comes out.  At the present time the 1988
hardbacks are on library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9.  The page numbers are in the center near the middle
binding.  The section numbers are along the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 651.  Here you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for
the United States to eliminate its armed forces.  This law was signed for
the United States in 1961.  John F. Kennedy signed it and every president
since has worked to enact its provisions.  The government knows you will
not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms.  (This is
Title 22 USC section 2551)
TURN TO PAGE 652.  Here you will find the definition of what the
government means by "disarmament."  The disarmament calls for the
elimination of our armed forces.  It also calls for the elimination of
weapons of all kinds.  (This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a)).
TURN TO PAGE 654.  Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control,
reduction and elimination of armed forces..."  and as Item (d)
"...Elimination of armed forces...".  What you need to know is that your
armed forces are being eliminated from national control which, in turn,
wipes out our sovereignty as a nation.  In two stages, we will have no
more army, no more navy, no more air force.  In the third stage, we shall
have a "zero" military.  Before Stage I closes, all citizen owned guns
will be banned.  (This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a).
Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document,
called Publication 7277.  Your librarian can also furnish you a copy.  Ask
the librarian to get you a copy of "The Blue Print for the Peace Race."
It is a 35 page booklet printed by the United States Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 - General Series 3 - Released May,
1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State Department
Document 7277.
Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1
million men.  China and the Soviets are to be reduced to that level also.
At this point, we are at Stage I at which time we are to transfer (on a
permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the
Russian and Chinese armies.  In Stage II the remaining one-half of our
armed forces is then turned over to this same Security Council of the
United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by
agreement, always be a Russian.  The world's smaller nations turn 100% of
their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security, Council in
Stage II.  President George Bush and Admiral Wm. J. Crowe [have refered]
to this process as being "in transition."
TURN TO PAGE 655.  On this page in Volume 9 of the United States Code,
read "Policy Formation."  The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify
objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone fromdisarmament, reducing or
limiting our armaments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is
pursuant to the treaty-making power of the president, or if it is
authorized by further legislation by the Congress. (This is title 22,
Section 2573.)
Every couple of years the House of Representatives votes to appropriate
funds for this on-going program.  Since P.L. 87-297 was first passed into
law in 1961, there have been 18 updates to it - all bad - with no
deletions of these issues I lay before you now.  The Congress knows that
the plan includes the policing of the United States by foreign troops.
(The world army they are forming.) The Congress is allowing our military
bases to beclosed down, except for those which will be used by the world
army.  You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in "The Blueprint
for the Peace Race."
If the president and Congress can promote a "Constitutional Convention"
you will find yourself with two new constitutions(communist in structure)
which in one states in Article VIII, Section 12: "No person shall bear
arms or possess lethal weapons except the police and members of the armed
forces...."  TheCongress has praised these documents and is on record in
Senatehearings seeking ways to install these constitutions.  Ask
yourlibrarian for "Revision of the United Nations Charter - Hearings Before
a Subcommittee (Foreign Relations) Feb. 2-20, 1950 U.S.Government Printing
Office."  Nothing has changed since.  Theyare still viable.
The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is
to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military
power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force..."
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free
to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined
above.  While you are at it, look up PublicLaw 101-216.
State Department Publication 7277 is available in electronic form as file
PUB_7277.ZIP on at least the following bulletin boards:
Paul Revere - San Jose (408) 947-7800 or (408) 279-0872
The Rising Storm       (408) 739-8693
If in future years your children or grandchildren ask why you allowed
their freedom to slip through your fingers, no one who has read this
material will be able to say;  "if only I had known."  Now that you have
read this, you know.  The question is; what are you going to do about it?

